Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tien-I Su

Rheumatology Whittier, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1750581930 CMS profile 555511

12456 Washington Blvd, Whittier, CA 90602

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,413

231 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$130,019

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,402,793 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Tien-I Su of Whittier, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,413 across 231 general payments and $130,019 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,402,793 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,397 39
2024 General $8,529 25
2024 Research $105 1
2023 General $818 24
2022 General $695 32
2022 Research $1,113 1
2021 General $638 34
2021 Research $65 1
2020 General $267 15
2020 Research $557 2
2019 General $1,070 62
2019 Research $128,179 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tien-I Su
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tien-I Su were reported at $1,397. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Tien-I Su Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,070 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $267 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $638 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $695 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $818 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $8,529 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,397 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $8,839 56 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $839 32 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $707 39 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $481 13 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $423 19 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $322 5 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $286 8 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $278 7 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $238 11 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $220 12 payments
  11. Other $782 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Grant $7,500 1 payment
  2. Food and Beverage $5,879 228 payments
  3. Education $35 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $8,631 47 payments
  2. XELJANZ $620 38 payments
  3. TREMFYA $452 10 payments
  4. EVENITY $311 10 payments
  5. OFEV $294 4 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $246 5 payments
  7. ORENCIA $220 12 payments
  8. HUMIRA $193 10 payments
  9. COSENTYX Immunology $192 9 payments
  10. COSENTYX Dermatology $185 8 payments
  11. Other $2,453 112 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $130,019 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

887

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$129,866

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

16.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prolia Denosumab Brand 38 $63,891
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 15 $40,242
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 30 $3,903
Lidocaine Generic 17 $3,306
Sildenafil Citrate Generic 21 $2,715
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 78 $2,643
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 62 $2,485
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 72 $1,742
Gabapentin Generic 87 $1,741
Leflunomide Generic 20 $1,687

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$371,096

Of which drugs: $265,863

Medicare patients

169

Average age 77

Services billed

32,743

150 women, 19 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Cancer 18%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 62 4,939 $101,562
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 12 10,720 $91,771
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 650 $65

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $7,624
$7,624 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $150
$150 — 10,720
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $145
$145 — —
KEVZARA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $137
$137 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $82
$82 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

237 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record