Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas McGee

Rheumatology Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1942253737 CMS profile 560437

1700 Springhill Ave, Suite 100, Mobile, AL 36604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,886

687 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas McGee of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,886 across 687 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,614 83
2024 General $1,900 98
2023 General $1,894 101
2022 General $1,964 112
2021 General $2,134 139
2020 General $1,192 74
2019 General $1,187 80

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas McGee
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas McGee were reported at $1,614. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Thomas McGee Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,187 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,192 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,134 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,964 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,894 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,900 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,614 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,259 167 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,962 193 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,275 75 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $567 26 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $403 24 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $378 23 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $359 30 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $331 20 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $302 11 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $235 10 payments
  11. Other $1,815 108 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,731 681 payments
  2. Education $155 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,182 112 payments
  2. BENLYSTA $1,223 71 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $866 45 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $856 52 payments
  5. Otezla $725 38 payments
  6. HUMIRA $632 32 payments
  7. Prolia $527 47 payments
  8. EVENITY $464 46 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $429 16 payments
  10. TREMFYA $389 18 payments
  11. Other $7,150 427 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 188 drugs

Part D claims

13,576

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$6,169,519

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 208 $1,757,349
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 150 $963,226
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 100 $763,709
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 52 $438,173
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 42 $243,621
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 48 $223,253
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 42 $178,471
Simponi Golimumab Brand 17 $155,196
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 54 $153,558
Otezla Apremilast Brand 16 $117,152

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 188 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 149 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$231,086

Of which drugs: $89,108

Medicare patients

406

Average age 76

Services billed

13,779

258 women, 148 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 69%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Osteoporosis 34%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Heart failure 20%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 31 3,240 $64,136
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 91 91 $7,446
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 16 16 $4,637
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 51 272 $191
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 28 94 $43
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 30 132 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $250
$250 48 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $229
$229 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $224
$224 150 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $194
$194 260 —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $143
$143 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

687 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record