Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Goodman

Rheumatology Groton, MA Medical Doctor

NPI 1194702555 CMS profile 8834

100 Boston Rd, Groton, MA 01450

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$211,269

1,362 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Goodman of Groton, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $211,269 across 1,362 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $20,238 103
2024 General $25,172 222
2023 General $21,697 189
2022 General $18,628 156
2021 General $33,331 197
2020 General $39,598 208
2019 General $52,605 287

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Goodman
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Goodman were reported at $20,238. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Goodman Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $52,605 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $39,598 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $33,331 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $18,628 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $21,697 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $25,172 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $20,238 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $95,532 84 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $56,766 192 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $23,524 133 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $8,602 40 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $7,467 43 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $2,481 49 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $2,469 116 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $2,221 107 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $2,028 108 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,930 95 payments
  11. Other $8,249 395 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $167,534 80 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $28,963 1,220 payments
  3. Honoraria $6,740 6 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $6,387 49 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $1,295 1 payment
  6. Education $349 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SIMPONI ARIA $147,038 228 payments
  2. TREMFYA $99,880 188 payments
  3. STELARA $88,793 114 payments
  4. TALTZ $21,185 67 payments
  5. KEVZARA $8,602 40 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $7,467 43 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $1,702 83 payments
  8. RINVOQ $1,160 51 payments
  9. XELJANZ $1,109 51 payments
  10. Cimzia $952 40 payments
  11. Other $19,082 961 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 91 drugs

Part D claims

4,304

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,243,055

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 64 $470,020
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 46 $306,306
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 31 $196,963
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 24 $159,493
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 12 $156,529
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 27 $125,710
Humira Adalimumab Brand 17 $125,669
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 20 $114,466
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 14 $101,623
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $84,770

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 91 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$126,928

Of which drugs: $4,614

Medicare patients

628

Average age 75

Services billed

2,532

324 women, 304 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 57%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Depression 18%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 58 255 $198
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 14 61 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$11,134 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
$10,420 — —
Cimzia
$334 — —
Arcalyst
$249 — —
XELJANZ
$197 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,362 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Massachusetts

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record