Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Galski

Nuclear Cardiology Moorestown, NJ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1811966187 CMS profile 309516

728 Marne Hwy Ste 200A, Moorestown, NJ 08057

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,342

327 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$30,781 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Thomas Galski of Moorestown, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,342 across 327 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $30,781 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Nuclear Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $714 20
2024 General $761 40
2023 General $1,084 40
2022 General $489 31
2021 General $1,058 28
2020 General $560 42
2019 General $1,676 126

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Galski
  • Nuclear Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Nuclear Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Galski were reported at $714. Among 99 Nuclear Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $434 and the middle half received between $138 and $985.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Galski Nuclear Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,676 $552 $91–$1,768 $163
2020 $560 $204 $61–$1,106 $114
2021 $1,058 $354 $99–$886 $132
2022 $489 $506 $101–$1,186 $149
2023 $1,084 $545 $148–$1,432 $160
2024 $761 $484 $131–$1,430 $164
2025 $714 $434 $138–$985 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $1,311 20 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,066 23 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $889 60 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $379 30 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $377 44 payments
  6. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $337 25 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $327 28 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $213 16 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $177 14 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $154 12 payments
  11. Other $1,112 55 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,842 326 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $500 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $861 58 payments
  2. Optimizer Smart System $754 5 payments
  3. OPTIMIZER Cardiovascular Device $517 13 payments
  4. OPTIMIZER Cardiovascular Device $517 13 payments
  5. Corlanor $509 34 payments
  6. WATCHMAN FLX $362 9 payments
  7. LifeVest $337 25 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $335 41 payments
  9. XARELTO $327 28 payments
  10. LEQVIO $285 23 payments
  11. Other $3,184 188 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 68 drugs

Part D claims

8,779

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,780,469

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 814 $864,324
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 212 $247,596
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 154 $174,357
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 138 $172,502
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 64 $73,179
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 39 $41,355
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 33 $40,030
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 25 $23,865
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 827 $12,634
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 918 $12,299

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 68 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$277,332

Of which drugs: $184

Medicare patients

1,858

Average age 77

Services billed

5,649

956 women, 902 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Diabetes 41%
Atrial fibrillation 38%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Heart failure 33%
Depression 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $82
$82 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $66
$66 212 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $51
$51 33 —
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $49
$49 154 —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $39
$39 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

327 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nuclear Cardiology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record