Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nasser Chaudhry

Nuclear Cardiology Cherry Hill, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1134108442 CMS profile 96589

1 Brace Rd Ste C1, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,413

717 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$37,682 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Nasser Chaudhry of Cherry Hill, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,413 across 717 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $37,682 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Nuclear Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $734 36
2024 General $965 50
2023 General $1,500 68
2022 General $1,887 138
2021 General $2,504 154
2020 General $1,853 124
2019 General $1,970 147

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nasser Chaudhry
  • Nuclear Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Nuclear Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nasser Chaudhry were reported at $734. Among 99 Nuclear Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $434 and the middle half received between $138 and $985.

Show as a table
Year Nasser Chaudhry Nuclear Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,970 $552 $91–$1,768 $163
2020 $1,853 $204 $61–$1,106 $114
2021 $2,504 $354 $99–$886 $132
2022 $1,887 $506 $101–$1,186 $149
2023 $1,500 $545 $148–$1,432 $160
2024 $965 $484 $131–$1,430 $164
2025 $734 $434 $138–$985 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,730 117 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,214 110 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,080 78 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $956 127 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $811 44 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $763 31 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $750 21 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $651 34 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $571 33 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $347 11 payments
  11. Other $2,540 111 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,364 714 payments
  2. Education $49 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $1,660 113 payments
  2. XARELTO $1,080 78 payments
  3. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $990 96 payments
  4. Corlanor $713 56 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $664 33 payments
  6. VERQUVO $599 35 payments
  7. ENTRESTO $597 103 payments
  8. FARXIGA $495 14 payments
  9. VYNDAQEL $422 22 payments
  10. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $377 26 payments
  11. Other $5,611 269 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 75 drugs

Part D claims

8,927

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,419,746

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

21.9%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 580 $676,615
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 130 $162,360
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 106 $146,275
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 104 $126,829
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 64 $41,355
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 22 $37,168
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 25 $24,866
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 16 $22,640
Repatha Syringe Evolocumab Brand 12 $17,202
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 20 $14,192

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 75 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$194,500

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,474

Average age 76

Services billed

3,965

798 women, 676 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 40%
Atrial fibrillation 40%
Heart failure 35%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $163
  • PFIZER INC. $42
$205 580 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $111
$111 118 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $84
$84 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $83
$83 22 —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $51
$51 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

717 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nuclear Cardiology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record