Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Taylor Mader

Rheumatology Greenwood, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1871888487 CMS profile 40035

210 Overland Dr, Greenwood, SC 29646

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,549

793 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Taylor Mader of Greenwood, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,549 across 793 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,724 106
2024 General $1,989 117
2023 General $1,821 111
2022 General $1,831 125
2021 General $1,409 106
2020 General $777 58
2019 General $1,998 170

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Taylor Mader
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Taylor Mader were reported at $1,724. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Taylor Mader Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,998 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $777 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,409 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,831 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,821 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,989 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,724 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $2,118 156 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,544 101 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,301 72 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,298 90 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,224 101 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,223 80 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,134 89 payments
  8. Organon LLC $203 11 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $179 9 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $169 11 payments
  11. Other $1,156 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,359 785 payments
  2. Education $190 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cimzia $1,691 131 payments
  2. TALTZ $1,221 78 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,158 96 payments
  4. RINVOQ $882 50 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $808 62 payments
  6. COSENTYX $733 63 payments
  7. TREMFYA $637 39 payments
  8. STELARA $554 44 payments
  9. SIMPONI $443 35 payments
  10. Bimzelx $426 25 payments
  11. Other $5,960 386 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

3,693

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$5,120,707

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.7%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 173 $1,694,921
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 167 $1,539,338
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 79 $677,043
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 52 $273,891
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 16 $181,236
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 12 $118,282
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 21 $112,684
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 14 $106,482
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 18 $100,464
Orencia Abatacept Brand 15 $90,281

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,472,780

Of which drugs: $3,187,912

Medicare patients

490

Average age 74

Services billed

365,853

350 women, 140 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 31%
Diabetes 30%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 53 34,600 $1,171,784
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 30 123,639 $581,524
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 51 144,200 $519,913
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 40 33,400 $301,508
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 61 5,880 $120,195

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
$255 — 144,200
XELJANZ
$195 28 —
TALTZ
$191 — —
Enbrel
$184 167 —
RINVOQ
$155 79 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

793 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record