Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tarek Shaath

Dermatology Altamonte Springs, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1366823775 CMS profile 1346458

118 W Orange St, Altamonte Springs, FL 32714

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,875

69 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tarek Shaath of Altamonte Springs, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,875 across 69 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 53rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $35 2
2023 General $41 1
2021 General $112 7
2020 General $557 24
2019 General $2,131 35

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tarek Shaath
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tarek Shaath were reported at $35. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Tarek Shaath Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,131 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $557 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $112 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $0 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $41 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $35 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,075 18 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $350 17 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $278 6 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $191 2 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $178 5 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $129 2 payments
  7. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $115 1 payment
  8. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $99 2 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $97 1 payment
  10. Celgene Corporation $83 1 payment
  11. Other $280 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,875 69 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $642 14 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $376 9 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $188 5 payments
  4. COSENTYX Immunology $183 11 payments
  5. TALTZ $178 5 payments
  6. COSENTYX Dermatology $168 6 payments
  7. TREMFYA $115 1 payment
  8. Enbrel $102 1 payment
  9. BOTOX COSMETIC $97 1 payment
  10. SOOLANTRA $91 1 payment
  11. Other $690 28 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

4,549

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$161,613

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

18.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 708 $35,334
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 612 $16,268
Tacrolimus Generic 97 $13,950
Metronidazole Generic 131 $12,505
Ketoconazole Generic 843 $11,906
Calcipotriene Generic 65 $11,683
Fluorouracil Generic 112 $8,610
Fluocinonide-E Fluocinonide/Emollient Base Brand 129 $7,756
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 371 $6,018
Ciclopirox Generic 240 $5,439

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 90 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,576,740

Of which drugs: $61,855

Medicare patients

1,241

Average age 75

Services billed

13,951

619 women, 622 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Diabetes 27%
Depression 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 93 682 $512

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

69 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record