Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tarek Kteleh

Rheumatology Muncie, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1932220035 CMS profile 269644

1107 S Tillotson Ave, Muncie, IN 47304

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,047

878 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tarek Kteleh of Muncie, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,047 across 878 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,161 161
2024 General $3,390 223
2023 General $4,261 146
2022 General $1,665 101
2021 General $684 46
2020 General $542 34
2019 General $2,344 167

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tarek Kteleh
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tarek Kteleh were reported at $2,161. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Tarek Kteleh Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,344 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $542 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $684 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,665 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $4,261 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,390 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,161 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $3,013 107 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,913 139 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,682 126 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,486 75 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,235 94 payments
  6. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $928 48 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $893 79 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $691 49 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $608 28 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $382 22 payments
  11. Other $2,217 111 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,600 860 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,875 1 payment
  3. Education $573 17 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $2,921 97 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,221 49 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,086 73 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $893 79 payments
  5. COSENTYX Immunology $637 45 payments
  6. ACTHAR $608 28 payments
  7. Cimzia $599 44 payments
  8. PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL $549 24 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $483 28 payments
  10. COSENTYX Dermatology $427 40 payments
  11. Other $7,568 524 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 43 drugs

Part D claims

5,287

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$5,157,795

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 183 $1,368,522
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 111 $896,367
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 96 $624,580
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 82 $502,264
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 76 $384,042
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 41 $263,196
Simponi Golimumab Brand 39 $254,800
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 21 $214,870
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 37 $208,529
Otezla Apremilast Brand 25 $118,415

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 43 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$662,007

Of which drugs: $562,922

Medicare patients

706

Average age 71

Services billed

90,939

565 women, 141 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Osteoporosis 27%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 73 73,201 $262,967
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 40 5,526 $183,029
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 19 5,271 $47,238
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 22 102 $67

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$591 — —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
$413 — —
XELJANZ
$308 53 —
RINVOQ
$289 96 —
SKYRIZI
$232 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

878 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record