Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tareck Kadrie

Neurology Chattanooga, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1700814191 CMS profile 77377

513 Dodds Ave Ste 103, Chattanooga, TN 37404

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$150,436

1,595 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tareck Kadrie of Chattanooga, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $150,436 across 1,595 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $22,710 267
2024 General $11,914 254
2023 General $4,259 287
2022 General $16,707 220
2021 General $32,338 260
2020 General $37,731 146
2019 General $24,777 161

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tareck Kadrie
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tareck Kadrie were reported at $22,710. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Tareck Kadrie Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $24,777 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $37,731 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $32,338 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $16,707 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $4,259 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $11,914 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $22,710 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $37,122 287 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $35,334 61 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $25,538 66 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,229 72 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $13,825 77 payments
  6. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $4,797 21 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $2,996 223 payments
  8. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,391 50 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $1,370 62 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $888 58 payments
  11. Other $11,946 618 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $116,373 75 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $25,999 1,481 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $6,606 30 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,150 2 payments
  5. Education $308 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AIMOVIG $35,337 63 payments
  2. AJOVY Central Nervous System $21,924 175 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $20,026 93 payments
  4. Ajovy Central Nervous System $14,426 53 payments
  5. UBRELVY Neuroscience $11,409 32 payments
  6. KISUNLA $11,178 20 payments
  7. UBRELVY Neuroscience $2,682 87 payments
  8. XYWAV $1,186 45 payments
  9. Briviact $991 43 payments
  10. BOTOX $911 57 payments
  11. Other $17,928 1,015 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 62 drugs

Part D claims

2,592

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,232,158

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 45 $362,371
Wakix Pitolisant Hcl Brand 21 $256,414
Gammaplex Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga 0-50 Brand 12 $241,518
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 13 $131,236
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 12 $59,992
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 19 $34,128
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 26 $17,782
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 16 $16,640
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 14 $16,203
Vimpat Lacosamide Brand 11 $13,019

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 62 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,145,261

Of which drugs: $922,984

Medicare patients

1,037

Average age 73

Services billed

58,589

568 women, 469 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 69%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 32%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 52 37,850 $177,853

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 47 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KISUNLA
$6,965 — —
XYWAV
$462 — —
Briviact
$433 — —
BOTOX
$313 — 37,850
Austedo XR
$186 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 47 with Patron

Records

1,595 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record