Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Kisunla

Drug Neuroscience

NDC 0002-9401-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,024,924

40,544 payments

Research payments

$1,622

42 payments

Through program year 2025, $6,024,924 in general payments and $1,622 in research payments were reported against Kisunla (Neuroscience).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $3,804,750 29,316
2025 Research $1,359 29
2024 General $2,220,173 11,228
2024 Research $262 13

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $5,633,617 40,309 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $390,616 208 payments
  3. Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch $691 27 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Ronald Schwartz Neurology · Hattiesburg, MS $105,036 3% · 120 payments
  2. Armen Moughamian Neurology · San Francisco, CA $100,020 3% · 63 payments
  3. Andrew Budson Neurology · Boston, MA $99,683 3% · 47 payments
  4. Paul Schulz Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry · Houston, TX $97,413 3% · 75 payments
  5. David Bear Neurology · Pensacola, FL $93,113 2% · 66 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $2,633,294 70% · 2,430 practitioners
  2. Family Medicine $184,151 5% · 2,123 practitioners
  3. Internal Medicine $147,721 4% · 2,044 practitioners
  4. Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry Psychiatry & Neurology $131,125 3% · 17 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $122,982 3% · 2,189 practitioners

The top 5 of 129 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Texas $421,762 11% · 1,303 recipients
  2. Florida $411,485 11% · 1,314 recipients
  3. California $378,677 10% · 1,077 recipients
  4. Arizona $298,071 8% · 452 recipients
  5. Ohio $247,704 7% · 510 recipients

The top 5 of 52 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to KISUNLA
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, donanemab-azbt, 2 mg J0175 24 449,525 $1,441,759

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

40,544 general · 42 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record