Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sunita Radhakrishnan

Ophthalmology San Francisco, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1578513248 CMS profile 436486

55 Stevenson St, San Francisco, CA 94105

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,780

102 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$250 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Sunita Radhakrishnan of San Francisco, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,780 across 102 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $250 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 67th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $493 14
2024 General $582 21
2023 General $607 23
2022 General $278 12
2021 General $47 2
2020 General $70 3
2019 General $705 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sunita Radhakrishnan
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sunita Radhakrishnan were reported at $493. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Sunita Radhakrishnan Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $705 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $70 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $47 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $278 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $607 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $582 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $493 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $931 30 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $394 13 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $289 12 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $286 10 payments
  5. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $213 11 payments
  6. Sight Sciences, Inc. $176 5 payments
  7. Thea Pharma Inc. $161 8 payments
  8. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $103 3 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $46 2 payments
  10. Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $34 1 payment
  11. Other $146 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,762 101 payments
  2. Education $18 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HYDRUS Microstent $536 10 payments
  2. VYZULTA $439 18 payments
  3. Rocklatan $312 16 payments
  4. LUMIGAN Eye Care $163 7 payments
  5. IYUZEH $161 8 payments
  6. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM $156 4 payments
  7. MIEBO $119 6 payments
  8. XEN $107 1 payment
  9. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $103 9 payments
  10. Simbrinza $83 4 payments
  11. Other $752 29 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

1,550

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$239,636

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

52.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 160 $57,385
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 70 $30,318
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 35 $20,393
Tafluprost Tafluprost/Pf Brand 83 $14,215
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 56 $12,234
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide/Timolol/Pf Brand 75 $11,958
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 41 $11,203
Azopt Brinzolamide Brand 22 $9,528
Timolol Maleate Timolol Maleate/Pf Brand 26 $9,299
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 18 $9,233

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 28 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$142,478

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

351

Average age 77

Services billed

1,857

207 women, 144 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 33%
Diabetes 19%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Cancer 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $147
$147 70 —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $73
$73 160 —
IYUZEH
  • Thea Pharma Inc. $53
$53 19 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $19
$19 — —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

102 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record