Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Samuels

Internal Medicine Greenwood, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1205806387 CMS profile 281879

701 E County Line Rd, Suite 101, Greenwood, IN 46143

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$72,283

1,693 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Steven Samuels of Greenwood, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $72,283 across 1,693 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,762 245
2024 General $3,809 250
2023 General $11,616 288
2022 General $25,116 286
2021 General $17,472 291
2020 General $4,609 160
2019 General $5,899 173

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Samuels
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Samuels were reported at $3,762. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Steven Samuels Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,899 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $4,609 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $17,472 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $25,116 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $11,616 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,809 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,762 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $29,950 90 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $13,352 195 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $9,428 50 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,669 204 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $2,277 222 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,429 16 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,208 95 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,116 92 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,099 125 payments
  10. Harmony Biosciences LLC $1,055 33 payments
  11. Other $8,700 571 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $35,106 21 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $22,615 1,635 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $12,714 7 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,566 21 payments
  5. Education $283 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $29,950 90 payments
  2. FARXIGA $8,672 27 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $7,667 117 payments
  4. SPRAVATO $1,263 2 payments
  5. EVENITY $1,166 149 payments
  6. Prolia $1,029 133 payments
  7. BREZTRI $841 10 payments
  8. Ozempic $779 95 payments
  9. XYWAV $670 23 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $663 56 payments
  11. Other $21,967 1,562 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 204 drugs

Part D claims

30,243

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,081,080

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 416 $665,986
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 246 $327,901
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 235 $315,027
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 230 $276,865
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 97 $187,062
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 121 $154,777
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 90 $121,981
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 86 $88,297
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 55 $69,421
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 37 $50,519

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 204 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 135 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$441,529

Of which drugs: $48,924

Medicare patients

1,481

Average age 76

Services billed

39,872

751 women, 730 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 56%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 37%
Depression 32%
COPD 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 307 314 $25,513
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 11 840 $17,386
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 16 16 $4,664
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 82 8,681 $818
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 24 30 $100

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 61 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XYWAV
$279 — —
RINVOQ
$244 — —
WAKIX
$214 — —
VRAYLAR
$169 — —
Sunosi
$169 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 61 with Patron

Records

1,693 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record