Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Joyce

Internal Medicine Sioux Falls, SD Medical Doctor

NPI 1316922875 CMS profile 1140479

4700 W 69Th St, Sioux Falls, SD 57108

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$241

3 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Steven Joyce of Sioux Falls, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $241 across 3 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 46th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $98 1
2023 General $125 1
2020 General $19 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Joyce
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Joyce were reported at $98. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Steven Joyce Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $19 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $0 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $0 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $125 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $98 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $125 1 payment
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $98 1 payment
  3. Amgen Inc. $19 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $241 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. RELISTOR $125 1 payment
  2. Kerendia $98 1 payment
  3. EVENITY $19 1 payment
  4. Prolia $19 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 126 drugs

Part D claims

8,450

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$352,697

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

14.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 107 $72,357
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 36 $52,064
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 68 $43,843
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 20 $24,160
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 14 $18,846
Victoza 3-Pak Liraglutide Brand 15 $13,859
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 17 $12,439
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 45 $8,676
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 717 $5,900
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 12 $5,504

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 126 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$48,054

Of which drugs: $4,048

Medicare patients

395

Average age 78

Services billed

5,420

201 women, 194 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Diabetes 37%
Arthritis 34%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 23%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 12 12 $3,431

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

3 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record