Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Brown

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Layton, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1649615873 CMS profile 4218655

2121 N 1700 W, Layton, UT 84041

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$104,951

713 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Steven Brown of Layton, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $104,951 across 713 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $60,428 148
2024 General $38,031 128
2023 General $1,723 100
2022 General $1,258 100
2021 General $1,046 78
2020 General $1,054 75
2019 General $1,413 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Brown
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Brown were reported at $60,428. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Steven Brown Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $1,413 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $1,054 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $1,046 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $1,258 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $1,723 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $38,031 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $60,428 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $54,301 79 payments
  2. Corcept Therapeutics $29,551 72 payments
  3. Ascendis Pharma, Inc. $12,862 17 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,053 115 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $963 80 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $825 55 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $799 31 payments
  8. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $764 42 payments
  9. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $586 29 payments
  10. Dexcom, Inc. $473 33 payments
  11. Other $2,776 160 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $75,939 28 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,060 655 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $10,173 24 payments
  4. Honoraria $6,745 3 payments
  5. Education $34 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TZIELD $50,727 61 payments
  2. Korlym $29,551 72 payments
  3. Yorvipath $12,862 17 payments
  4. Ozempic $895 95 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $789 87 payments
  6. EVENITY $489 21 payments
  7. RECORLEV $474 26 payments
  8. Prolia $464 19 payments
  9. FreeStyle Libre 3 $456 32 payments
  10. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $360 22 payments
  11. Other $6,825 444 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 49 drugs

Part D claims

2,175

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,073,331

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

39.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Korlym Mifepristone Brand 12 $260,864
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 129 $182,120
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 62 $109,200
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 58 $93,869
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 62 $89,294
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 40 $52,268
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 40 $51,434
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 22 $39,213
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 14 $38,668
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 60 $37,810

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 49 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 64 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$105,414

Of which drugs: $31,746

Medicare patients

252

Average age 73

Services billed

4,360

163 women, 89 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 55%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Arthritis 44%
Osteoporosis 31%
Depression 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 16 1,560 $31,636

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TZIELD
$33,113 — —
Korlym
$271 12 —
RECORLEV
$151 — —
JARDIANCE
$85 58 —
MOUNJARO
$72 62 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

713 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record