Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steve Musick

Dermatology Swansea, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1831176775 CMS profile 128352

4948 Benchmark Centre Dr, Swansea, IL 62226

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,944

1,251 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Steve Musick of Swansea, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,944 across 1,251 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,435 205
2024 General $3,643 207
2023 General $3,696 225
2022 General $2,788 162
2021 General $1,931 125
2020 General $2,072 104
2019 General $4,379 223

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steve Musick
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steve Musick were reported at $3,435. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Steve Musick Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,379 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,072 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,931 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,788 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,696 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,643 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,435 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,391 226 payments
  2. Merz North America, Inc. $1,993 8 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,838 92 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,472 101 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,423 70 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,137 66 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $1,134 78 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,075 55 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $1,035 62 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $852 69 payments
  11. Other $6,595 424 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,169 1,238 payments
  2. Education $775 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Xeomin $1,993 8 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,361 88 payments
  3. TREMFYA $1,220 44 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $1,182 81 payments
  5. ILUMYA $1,085 80 payments
  6. Otezla $1,074 74 payments
  7. VTAMA $901 76 payments
  8. TALTZ $840 48 payments
  9. STELARA $808 63 payments
  10. CIBINQO $786 44 payments
  11. Other $14,817 890 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,432

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,002,717

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 12 $243,298
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 32 $213,671
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 40 $175,276
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $146,900
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 18 $131,386
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $48,536
Oracea Doxycycline Monohydrate Brand 15 $13,515
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 119 $4,288
Fluorouracil Generic 63 $3,843
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 156 $3,337

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 83 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$756,247

Of which drugs: $26,452

Medicare patients

1,178

Average age 76

Services billed

32,393

526 women, 652 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 16%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 70 21,800 $26,356
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 36 148 $96

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VTAMA
$440 — —
RINVOQ
$430 — —
OPZELURA
$248 — —
ADBRY
$239 — —
SKYRIZI
$229 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,251 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record