Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ahmad Amin

Dermatology Naperville, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1609037357 CMS profile 1307959

636 Raymond Dr Ste 201, Naperville, IL 60563

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,144,832

3,450 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$637

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$409,165 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Ahmad Amin of Naperville, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,144,832 across 3,450 general payments and $637 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $409,165 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $826,341 619
2024 General $838,473 638
2023 General $750,039 623
2023 Research $637 2
2022 General $601,790 490
2021 General $348,263 287
2020 General $239,690 203
2019 General $540,235 590

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ahmad Amin
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ahmad Amin were reported at $826,341. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Ahmad Amin Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $540,235 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $239,690 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $348,263 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $601,790 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $750,039 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $838,473 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $826,341 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $784,768 630 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $635,278 556 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $519,864 296 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $390,692 295 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $379,338 365 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $323,203 161 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $269,422 297 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $217,971 197 payments
  9. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $184,241 172 payments
  10. Celgene Corporation $93,062 72 payments
  11. Other $346,992 409 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,421,384 979 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $406,919 948 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $238,343 83 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $42,681 1,406 payments
  5. Honoraria $34,800 11 payments
  6. Education $705 23 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $659,012 356 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $423,799 327 payments
  3. TALTZ $352,860 280 payments
  4. TREMFYA $338,227 312 payments
  5. SOTYKTU $294,089 138 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $267,421 219 payments
  7. RINVOQ $237,259 204 payments
  8. VTAMA $209,455 193 payments
  9. Otezla $191,868 181 payments
  10. Cimzia $183,187 212 payments
  11. Other $971,716 988 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $637 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

688

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$2,196,926

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

37.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 55 $513,561
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 19 $379,158
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 34 $307,839
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 41 $278,889
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 20 $248,287
Skyrizi Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 11 $202,864
Cosentyx (2 Syringes) Secukinumab Brand 14 $103,870
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 18 $87,300
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 15 $64,207
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 47 $2,375

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$135,427

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

481

Average age 73

Services billed

2,626

203 women, 278 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 59%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 17%
Cancer 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Depression 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$203,546 33 —
SOTYKTU
$90,158 — —
VTAMA
$80,454 — —
Bimzelx
$79,331 — —
TREMFYA
$68,283 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

3,452 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record