Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Coleman

Family Medicine Salt Lake City, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1891720124 CMS profile 312947

6360 S 3000 E, Ste 100, Salt Lake City, UT 84121

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,810

384 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,943,753 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Stephen Coleman of Salt Lake City, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,810 across 384 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,943,753 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,558 85
2024 General $1,312 72
2023 General $1,213 66
2022 General $888 51
2021 General $774 45
2020 General $379 28
2019 General $1,687 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Coleman
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Coleman were reported at $1,558. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Coleman Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,687 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $379 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $774 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $888 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,213 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,312 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,558 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,742 88 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,522 29 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $528 29 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $509 34 payments
  5. ViiV Healthcare Company $383 21 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $293 16 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $289 19 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $235 12 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $208 13 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $189 9 payments
  11. Other $1,913 114 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,935 380 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $876 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PREVNAR - 13 $1,304 5 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $750 37 payments
  3. UBRELVY $679 36 payments
  4. QULIPTA $544 31 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $307 20 payments
  6. FARXIGA $283 11 payments
  7. BREZTRI $273 10 payments
  8. APRETUDE $240 14 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $236 7 payments
  10. SHINGRIX $235 12 payments
  11. Other $4,761 315 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 65 drugs

Part D claims

2,496

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$226,750

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 39 $64,330
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 35 $43,867
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 23 $38,742
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 15 $17,946
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 16 $12,554
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 13 $9,351
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 283 $3,307
Testosterone Generic 25 $3,234
Omeprazole Generic 102 $2,427
Testosterone Cypionate Generic 33 $2,093

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 65 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 73 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$52,823

Of which drugs: $13,776

Medicare patients

128

Average age 72

Services billed

1,175

51 women, 77 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 37%
Diabetes 30%
Depression 17%
Ischemic heart disease 14%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Cancer 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 32 32 $9,236
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 19 20 $2,910
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 19 19 $1,555

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $184
$184 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $153
$153 — —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $136
$136 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $82
$82 35 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $69
$69 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

384 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record