Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Erickson

Family Medicine Bountiful, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1780681775 CMS profile 353595

440 Medical Dr, Suite 4, Bountiful, UT 84010

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$100,938

272 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,917

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,615,592 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Scott Erickson of Bountiful, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $100,938 across 272 general payments and $1,917 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,615,592 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,453 35
2024 General $1,241 21
2024 Research $1,917 1
2023 General $5,763 24
2022 General $17,146 33
2021 General $17,055 42
2020 General $10,818 35
2019 General $36,463 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Erickson
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Erickson were reported at $12,453. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Scott Erickson Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $36,463 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $10,818 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $17,055 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $17,146 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $5,763 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,241 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $12,453 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alkermes, Inc. $85,352 154 payments
  2. Indivior Inc. $12,945 62 payments
  3. US WorldMeds, LLC $1,757 3 payments
  4. Braeburn Inc. $109 6 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $96 6 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $86 6 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $76 5 payments
  8. ITI, Inc. $72 3 payments
  9. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $70 4 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $55 3 payments
  11. Other $320 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $77,238 41 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $14,988 80 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $4,699 148 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,500 1 payment
  5. Honoraria $500 1 payment
  6. Education $13 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VIVITROL $85,352 154 payments
  2. SUBLOCADE Oud $12,752 50 payments
  3. Lucemyra/Lofexidine $1,257 2 payments
  4. SUBLOCADE Oud $193 12 payments
  5. BRIXADI $109 6 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $81 5 payments
  7. Ozempic $76 5 payments
  8. CAPLYTA $72 3 payments
  9. QUVIVIQ $70 4 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $62 4 payments
  11. Other $573 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Indivior Inc. $1,917 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

768

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$42,028

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

26%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 28 $15,909
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 11 $10,869
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 126 $8,413
Buprenorphine Hcl Generic 46 $1,605
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 78 $667
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 18 $517
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 27 $431
Dextroamphetamine-Amphetamine Dextroamphetamine/Amphetamine Brand 11 $389
Omeprazole Generic 36 $311
Metformin Hcl Generic 28 $223

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$12,086

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

39

Average age 73

Services billed

186

17 women, 22 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Diabetes 33%
Arthritis 31%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VIVITROL
  • Alkermes, Inc. $871
$871 — —
SUBLOCADE
  • Indivior Inc. $276
$276 — —
BRIXADI
  • Braeburn Inc. $79
$79 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $7
$7 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $7
$7 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

273 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record