Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephanie Traxinger

Family Medicine Bismarck, ND Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1366608465 CMS profile 16337

401 N 9Th St., Bismarck, ND 58501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,603

168 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Stephanie Traxinger of Bismarck, ND is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,603 across 168 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $85 1
2023 General $15 1
2022 General $816 53
2021 General $922 58
2020 General $415 25
2019 General $350 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephanie Traxinger
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephanie Traxinger were reported at $0. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Stephanie Traxinger Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $350 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $415 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $922 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $816 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $15 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $85 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $0 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $437 25 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $402 20 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $376 25 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $283 27 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $203 12 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $202 13 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $128 7 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $100 7 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $83 6 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $75 4 payments
  11. Other $314 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $2,463 166 payments
  2. Education $140 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Ozempic $437 25 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $406 23 payments
  3. Prolia $284 19 payments
  4. EVENITY $271 18 payments
  5. MYRBETRIQ $247 17 payments
  6. SOLIQUA 100/33 $190 12 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $186 11 payments
  8. UBRELVY $128 7 payments
  9. Repatha $105 7 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $102 11 payments
  11. Other $1,060 76 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 114 drugs

Part D claims

8,118

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$606,173

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

22.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 187 $142,842
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 98 $87,507
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 45 $58,267
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 62 $41,059
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 49 $38,467
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 52 $31,727
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 38 $21,047
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 21 $20,378
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 20 $20,308
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 22 $12,002

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 114 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$178,300

Of which drugs: $87,263

Medicare patients

390

Average age 73

Services billed

5,531

344 women, 46 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 40%
Osteoporosis 31%
Diabetes 19%
Depression 18%
Cancer 16%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Ischemic heart disease 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 34 3,660 $74,014
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 21 21 $6,115
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 50 50 $4,091
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 19 19 $2,879

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

168 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in North Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record