Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sonwoo Lee

Rheumatology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1336168616 CMS profile 105765

505 S Virgil Ave, Suite 208, Los Angeles, CA 90020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,462

103 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sonwoo Lee of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,462 across 103 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $84 3
2024 General $135 5
2023 General $188 7
2022 General $618 23
2021 General $716 25
2020 General $182 8
2019 General $1,540 32

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sonwoo Lee
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sonwoo Lee were reported at $84. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Sonwoo Lee Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,540 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $182 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $716 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $618 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $188 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $135 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $84 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,013 25 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $585 26 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $563 17 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $265 5 payments
  5. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $256 3 payments
  6. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $141 6 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $126 2 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $125 1 payment
  9. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $46 2 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $44 2 payments
  11. Other $299 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,462 103 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Vascepa Hypertriglyceridemia $684 11 payments
  2. CREON $541 24 payments
  3. EVENITY $427 15 payments
  4. Prolia $413 15 payments
  5. Vascepa Cardiovascular $329 14 payments
  6. FARXIGA $265 5 payments
  7. LINZESS Gastroenterology $250 10 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $182 2 payments
  9. Linzess Gi $141 6 payments
  10. Kerendia $125 1 payment
  11. Other $554 23 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 212 drugs

Part D claims

34,399

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,493,267

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 883 $1,029,047
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 818 $530,817
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 1,263 $392,583
Prolia Denosumab Brand 202 $342,229
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 365 $251,485
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 323 $208,127
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 342 $199,292
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 176 $171,388
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 281 $136,853
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $95,440

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 212 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$288,357

Of which drugs: $21,983

Medicare patients

475

Average age 80

Services billed

10,122

312 women, 163 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Heart failure 70%
Depression 59%
Arthritis 59%
Osteoporosis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Alzheimer's or dementia 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 30 243 $12,811
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 181 184 $4,030
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 26 26 $3,401
Injection, trimethobenzamide hcl, up to 200 mg J3250 Office 36 50 $813
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 54 3,961 $378
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 101 187 $85
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 101 184 $56
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 19 24 $51
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 31 45 $38

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CREON
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 883 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26
$26 365 —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $13
$13 — —
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $13
$13 202 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

103 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record