Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sonalika Khachikian

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Rapid City, SD Medical Doctor

NPI 1699934067 CMS profile 31054

640 Flormann St, Rapid City, SD 57701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$364,579

770 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$416

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$144,703 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Sonalika Khachikian of Rapid City, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $364,579 across 770 general payments and $416 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $144,703 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $128,016 153
2024 General $132,278 151
2023 General $62,193 102
2022 General $4,643 38
2022 Research $31 1
2021 General $2,649 60
2021 Research $385 1
2020 General $4,486 67
2019 General $30,313 199

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sonalika Khachikian
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sonalika Khachikian were reported at $128,016. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Sonalika Khachikian Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $30,313 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $4,486 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $2,649 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $4,643 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $62,193 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $132,278 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $128,016 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $259,866 292 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $65,161 95 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $32,886 159 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,786 73 payments
  5. Dexcom, Inc. $1,192 37 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $428 37 payments
  7. Medtronic, Inc. $301 7 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $247 9 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $213 8 payments
  10. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. $189 4 payments
  11. Other $1,310 49 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $199,790 107 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $52,420 102 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $49,495 21 payments
  4. Honoraria $48,607 30 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $14,246 507 payments
  6. Education $21 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TEPEZZA Inflammation/Rare Disease $209,898 215 payments
  2. TEPEZZA Tepezza $65,161 95 payments
  3. INVOKANA $32,895 158 payments
  4. EVENITY $29,886 52 payments
  5. UPLIZNA $7,277 4 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $2,011 45 payments
  7. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $680 21 payments
  8. Prolia $513 35 payments
  9. Ozempic $292 48 payments
  10. DEXCOM CGM $263 5 payments
  11. Other $3,932 208 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $416 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 82 drugs

Part D claims

5,318

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$1,587,964

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

45.2%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 365 $505,929
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 201 $223,236
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 66 $96,159
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 73 $83,882
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 84 $80,651
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 28 $56,600
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 44 $56,057
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 84 $44,747
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 44 $44,606
Humulin R U-500 Kwikpen Insulin Regular, Human Brand 29 $38,544

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 82 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$128,816

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

702

Average age 70

Services billed

2,345

444 women, 258 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 62%
Arthritis 46%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Osteoporosis 34%
Depression 27%
Heart failure 26%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $126,036
$126,036 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $93
$93 — —
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $33
$33 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

772 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record