Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sok Nam

Ophthalmology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1538265632 CMS profile 342126

4278 W 3Rd St, Los Angeles, CA 90020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,866

906 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$581

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,829 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Sok Nam of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,866 across 906 general payments and $581 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,829 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,803 78
2024 General $1,878 91
2023 General $2,392 91
2022 General $3,225 142
2021 General $2,909 161
2020 General $2,687 154
2020 Research $581 1
2019 General $2,973 189

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sok Nam
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sok Nam were reported at $1,803. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Sok Nam Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,973 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $2,687 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $2,909 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $3,225 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $2,392 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,878 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $1,803 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $3,904 217 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,904 124 payments
  3. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,196 146 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $2,119 113 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $2,024 70 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,683 109 payments
  7. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,102 54 payments
  8. Glaukos Corporation $596 13 payments
  9. Thea Pharma Inc. $466 22 payments
  10. Shire North American Group Inc $263 12 payments
  11. Other $609 26 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,866 906 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cequa $1,991 68 payments
  2. LUMIGAN Eye Care $1,809 75 payments
  3. PROLENSA $1,573 69 payments
  4. XIIDRA $1,369 75 payments
  5. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $1,281 77 payments
  6. RESTASIS MULTIDOSE $1,045 55 payments
  7. VUITY $1,016 47 payments
  8. RESTASIS $878 47 payments
  9. VYZULTA $815 52 payments
  10. BESIVANCE $795 71 payments
  11. Other $7,108 345 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $581 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

14,875

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$4,940,289

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

67.3%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 3,327 $2,688,699
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 1,453 $498,444
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 407 $356,451
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 371 $308,064
Cyclosporine Generic 708 $296,061
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 219 $165,334
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 257 $103,229
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 319 $88,029
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 354 $82,892
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 209 $72,534

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$802,167

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

986

Average age 78

Services billed

8,187

631 women, 355 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 64%
Arthritis 59%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Osteoporosis 33%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Heart failure 22%
Depression 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $641
$641 1,453 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $401
$401 371 —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $197
$197 209 —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $182
$182 219 —
IYUZEH
  • Thea Pharma Inc. $146
$146 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

907 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record