Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Simin Ovais

Internal Medicine Jefferson City, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1306957691 CMS profile 285670

1241 W Stadium Blvd, Jefferson City, MO 65109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,246

457 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Simin Ovais of Jefferson City, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,246 across 457 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,117 78
2024 General $1,216 84
2023 General $917 85
2022 General $1,013 65
2021 General $1,099 78
2020 General $452 38
2019 General $433 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Simin Ovais
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Simin Ovais were reported at $1,117. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Simin Ovais Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $433 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $452 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,099 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,013 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $917 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,216 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,117 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,211 92 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $626 58 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $523 39 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $474 30 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $459 45 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $408 29 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $337 24 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $236 23 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $188 13 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $131 8 payments
  11. Other $1,653 96 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,210 455 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $21 1 payment
  3. Education $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $837 57 payments
  2. QULIPTA $587 38 payments
  3. SHINGRIX $408 29 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $402 43 payments
  5. INJECTAFER $321 23 payments
  6. Ozempic $311 25 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $286 23 payments
  8. Prolia $281 19 payments
  9. ZAVZPRET $269 31 payments
  10. EVENITY $257 17 payments
  11. Other $4,467 317 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 124 drugs

Part D claims

8,748

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$498,500

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 101 $109,706
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 97 $107,222
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 66 $44,468
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 46 $26,726
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 22 $18,804
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 25 $17,428
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 16 $15,518
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 21 $13,556
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 12 $13,482
Bydureon Bcise Exenatide Microspheres Brand 13 $10,793

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 124 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 80 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$123,991

Of which drugs: $10,960

Medicare patients

302

Average age 74

Services billed

3,737

222 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
COPD 17%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 55 55 $4,408
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 19 20 $2,934

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $139
$139 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $113
$113 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $78
$79 — —
SHINGRIX
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $63
$63 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $63
$63 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

457 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record