Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sharon Mitchell

Internal Medicine Baldwyn, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1306806930 CMS profile 104597

745 Hwy 145 South, Baldwyn, MS 38824

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$944

39 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sharon Mitchell of Baldwyn, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $944 across 39 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $277 9
2024 General $78 5
2023 General $78 5
2022 General $43 3
2021 General $64 4
2020 General $251 4
2019 General $153 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sharon Mitchell
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sharon Mitchell were reported at $277. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Sharon Mitchell Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $153 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $251 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $64 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $43 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $78 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $78 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $277 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $310 8 payments
  2. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $125 1 payment
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $122 7 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $55 3 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $54 4 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $46 3 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $44 2 payments
  8. Mylan Specialty L.P. $28 2 payments
  9. Corcept Therapeutics $25 1 payment
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $23 1 payment
  11. Other $112 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $944 39 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $310 8 payments
  2. Orserdu $125 1 payment
  3. RYBELSUS $89 6 payments
  4. Ozempic $89 6 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $55 3 payments
  6. LONHALA MAGNAIR $54 4 payments
  7. EVENITY $46 3 payments
  8. Prolia $46 3 payments
  9. FreeStyle Libre 3 $44 2 payments
  10. YUPELRI $28 2 payments
  11. Other $193 11 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 129 drugs

Part D claims

6,300

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$408,841

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

30.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 89 $106,493
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 76 $73,080
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 29 $35,344
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 45 $34,473
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 32 $23,366
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 18 $17,824
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 23 $13,324
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 380 $8,336
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 14 $8,063
Synjardy Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 11 $6,437

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 129 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 125 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$118,373

Of which drugs: $3,679

Medicare patients

195

Average age 73

Services billed

5,650

124 women, 71 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 28%
COPD 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 70 70 $1,029
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 34 2,020 $202
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 14 26 $65
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 22 140 $45
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 15 54 $27
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 40 136 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $14
$14 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $14
$14 18 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $9
$9 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $9
$9 89 —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $7
$7 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

39 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record