Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sharon Hong

Rheumatology Flowood, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1275820722 CMS profile 884104

2550 Flowood Dr, Suite 300, Flowood, MS 39232

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,990

1,392 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sharon Hong of Flowood, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,990 across 1,392 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,945 184
2024 General $3,065 167
2023 General $3,370 180
2022 General $2,778 163
2021 General $2,736 185
2020 General $3,009 207
2019 General $4,087 306

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sharon Hong
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sharon Hong were reported at $2,945. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Sharon Hong Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,087 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,009 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,736 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,778 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,370 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,065 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,945 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $4,540 282 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $4,449 279 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,132 137 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,825 108 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,182 94 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,175 66 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $928 86 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $839 56 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $805 45 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $604 39 payments
  11. Other $3,510 200 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,811 1,385 payments
  2. Education $179 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,764 163 payments
  2. Cimzia $1,846 120 payments
  3. Prolia $1,400 88 payments
  4. Enbrel $1,214 82 payments
  5. Otezla $1,178 74 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $1,175 66 payments
  7. TREMFYA $1,169 67 payments
  8. EVENITY $1,136 68 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $1,008 65 payments
  10. COSENTYX $865 63 payments
  11. Other $13,107 838 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

2,385

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$384,135

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 23 $165,118
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 12 $87,976
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 12 $81,907
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 665 $19,408
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 385 $7,569
Leflunomide Generic 161 $6,661
Sulfasalazine Generic 236 $4,570
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 108 $3,362
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 111 $1,389
Gabapentin Generic 119 $946

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,336,068

Of which drugs: $2,114,019

Medicare patients

693

Average age 74

Services billed

224,567

568 women, 125 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 38%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Depression 19%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 39 18,525 $620,221
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 14 66,240 $311,659
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 78 33,901 $305,716
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 140 11,520 $236,294
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 25 62,200 $224,567
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 26 5,290 $132,007
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 11 760 $175

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$391 12 —
Cimzia
$298 — 62,200
COSENTYX
$258 — —
BENLYSTA
$243 — —
SKYRIZI
$191 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,392 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record