Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sharif Khan

Hematology Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1184683435 CMS profile 325274

104 Innovation Drive, Suite 2000, Greenville, SC 29607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,863

102 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,737,146 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Sharif Khan of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,863 across 102 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,737,146 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Hematology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,527 16
2024 General $1,005 11
2023 General $1,709 25
2022 General $808 13
2021 General $577 6
2020 General $664 11
2019 General $574 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sharif Khan
  • Hematology median
  • Middle half of Hematology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sharif Khan were reported at $1,527. Among 733 Hematology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,155 and the middle half received between $135 and $8,023.

Show as a table
Year Sharif Khan Hematology median Middle half National median
2019 $574 $1,012 $122–$9,834 $163
2020 $664 $1,475 $115–$9,198 $114
2021 $577 $1,470 $125–$7,444 $132
2022 $808 $1,371 $139–$8,471 $149
2023 $1,709 $1,295 $147–$11,010 $160
2024 $1,005 $1,286 $146–$9,230 $164
2025 $1,527 $1,155 $135–$8,023 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kite Pharma, Inc. $745 10 payments
  2. Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation $673 8 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $665 6 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $488 5 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $478 5 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $380 5 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $371 6 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $303 5 payments
  9. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $299 3 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $260 3 payments
  11. Other $2,202 46 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,661 98 payments
  2. Education $202 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. clonoSEQ $509 6 payments
  2. MONJUVI $493 4 payments
  3. Yescarta $403 4 payments
  4. POTELIGEO $299 3 payments
  5. OJJAARA $262 3 payments
  6. UVADEX $257 2 payments
  7. CARVYKTI $244 2 payments
  8. EPKINLY $238 2 payments
  9. BLENREP $216 2 payments
  10. Blincyto $210 2 payments
  11. Other $3,756 89 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

978

Median for Hematology: 273

Drug cost

$3,779,371

Median for Hematology: $800,183

Branded share of claims

43.3%

Median for Hematology: 39.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 52 $1,017,726
Lenalidomide Generic 41 $544,464
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 27 $454,890
Ninlaro Ixazomib Citrate Brand 29 $386,972
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 34 $385,832
Targretin Bexarotene Brand 11 $271,748
Scemblix Asciminib Hydrochloride Brand 11 $239,974
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 16 $175,875
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 11 $144,255
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 18 $73,814

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 799 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$158,893

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

530

Average age 76

Services billed

1,478

263 women, 267 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 29%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
COPD 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OJJAARA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $149
$149 — —
Yescarta
  • Kite Pharma, Inc. $131
$131 — —
BELEODAQ
  • Acrotech Biopharma LLC $123
$123 — —
EPKINLY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $121
$121 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

102 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record