Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Asim Pati

Hematology Spartanburg, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1841294121 CMS profile 129305

101 E Wood St, Spartanburg, SC 29303

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$36,657

782 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$287,080 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Asim Pati of Spartanburg, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $36,657 across 782 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $287,080 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Hematology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,077 150
2024 General $3,041 146
2023 General $8,330 158
2022 General $4,927 133
2021 General $433 22
2020 General $8,035 43
2019 General $6,814 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Asim Pati
  • Hematology median
  • Middle half of Hematology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Asim Pati were reported at $5,077. Among 733 Hematology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,155 and the middle half received between $135 and $8,023.

Show as a table
Year Asim Pati Hematology median Middle half National median
2019 $6,814 $1,012 $122–$9,834 $163
2020 $8,035 $1,475 $115–$9,198 $114
2021 $433 $1,470 $125–$7,444 $132
2022 $4,927 $1,371 $139–$8,471 $149
2023 $8,330 $1,295 $147–$11,010 $160
2024 $3,041 $1,286 $146–$9,230 $164
2025 $5,077 $1,155 $135–$8,023 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $5,908 46 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $5,324 29 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $4,282 37 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $3,052 62 payments
  5. BeiGene USA, Inc. $2,039 11 payments
  6. Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC $1,872 7 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $1,483 19 payments
  8. Kite Pharma, Inc. $1,447 6 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $863 51 payments
  10. Eisai Inc. $789 37 payments
  11. Other $9,597 477 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $20,154 12 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,867 755 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,386 9 payments
  4. Education $250 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CALQUENCE $5,374 19 payments
  2. CD38 $4,374 4 payments
  3. BRUKINSA $2,534 14 payments
  4. RITUXAN $1,800 1 payment
  5. TIBSOVO $1,760 1 payment
  6. Yescarta $1,396 3 payments
  7. VENCLEXTA $1,280 8 payments
  8. Lenvima $743 34 payments
  9. REBLOZYL $603 28 payments
  10. KEYTRUDA $601 29 payments
  11. Other $15,857 878 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,222

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$5,208,727

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

45.2%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 117 $1,807,178
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 67 $890,604
Sprycel Dasatinib Brand 44 $706,410
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 66 $597,793
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 22 $469,451
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 17 $286,698
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 13 $166,454
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 15 $146,449
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 92 $77,040
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 50 $37,633

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$69,925

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

399

Average age 75

Services billed

1,058

221 women, 178 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Heart failure 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 72 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
$266 — —
Lenvima
$219 — —
REBLOZYL
$159 — —
TAGRISSO
$109 — —
KEYTRUDA
$106 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 72 with Patron

Records

782 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record