Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shane Bailey

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology New Braunfels, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1437213337 CMS profile 110741

479 Oxford Dr Ste 104, New Braunfels, TX 78130

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$44,506

929 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shane Bailey of New Braunfels, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $44,506 across 929 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,772 80
2024 General $3,866 87
2023 General $5,761 140
2022 General $5,582 150
2021 General $4,403 125
2020 General $9,119 137
2019 General $9,003 210

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shane Bailey
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shane Bailey were reported at $6,772. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Shane Bailey Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $9,003 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $9,119 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $4,403 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $5,582 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $5,761 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $3,866 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $6,772 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $13,223 241 payments
  2. Biosense Webster, Inc. $8,016 187 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $7,720 91 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $6,415 231 payments
  5. Atricure, Inc. $1,877 19 payments
  6. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $1,575 1 payment
  7. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $1,141 58 payments
  8. BioSig Technologies, Inc. $1,000 1 payment
  9. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $785 13 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $772 18 payments
  11. Other $1,983 69 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $34,625 912 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,675 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,759 10 payments
  4. Honoraria $1,000 1 payment
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $250 1 payment
  6. Education $197 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ensite Cardiac Mapping System $5,300 67 payments
  2. Carto 3 $3,845 96 payments
  3. COBALT DR MRI SURESCAN $3,653 160 payments
  4. FARAPULSE $2,551 7 payments
  5. Assurity Pacemaker $1,666 27 payments
  6. Carto 3 System $1,491 18 payments
  7. PURE EP SYSTEM $1,000 1 payment
  8. EnSite Precision Cardiac Mapping System $974 28 payments
  9. Micra $928 24 payments
  10. XARELTO $809 19 payments
  11. Other $18,721 509 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

535

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$85,861

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 92 $65,785
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $13,586
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 86 $1,851
Flecainide Acetate Generic 62 $1,644
Dabigatran Etexilate Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate Brand 12 $1,284
Sucralfate Generic 60 $653
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 56 $571
Potassium Chloride Generic 34 $166
Pantoprazole Sodium Generic 52 $134
Metoprolol Tartrate Generic 24 $101

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 69 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$309,503

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

820

Average age 77

Services billed

2,934

353 women, 467 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 73%
Ischemic heart disease 59%
Arthritis 52%
Heart failure 44%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XARELTO
$129 15 —
ELIQUIS
$47 92 —
Ozempic
$16 — —
Arcalyst
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

929 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record