Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shamil Patel

Ophthalmology Glendale, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1821298134 CMS profile 310261

6677 W Thunderbird Rd Ste F101, Glendale, AZ 85306

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$116,223

356 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$341,009 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2021

Through program year 2025, Shamil Patel of Glendale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $116,223 across 356 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $341,009 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $35,088 67
2024 General $17,829 50
2023 General $13,274 54
2022 General $33,123 41
2021 General $11,663 43
2020 General $3,556 52
2019 General $1,690 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shamil Patel
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shamil Patel were reported at $35,088. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Shamil Patel Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,690 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $3,556 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $11,663 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $33,123 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $13,274 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $17,829 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $35,088 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nova Eye, Inc. $74,502 16 payments
  2. Glaukos Corporation $28,632 62 payments
  3. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,189 74 payments
  4. Alcon Vision LLC $1,872 43 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,566 50 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $1,515 22 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $1,192 32 payments
  8. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $600 1 payment
  9. New World Medical,Inc. $541 7 payments
  10. RxSight Inc $422 5 payments
  11. Other $2,191 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $76,930 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $16,254 336 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $13,289 2 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $9,750 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. iDose $13,507 12 payments
  2. Travoprost Intraocular Implant - iDose $5,600 2 payments
  3. rhopressa $2,803 68 payments
  4. rocklatan $2,803 68 payments
  5. VYZULTA $1,636 24 payments
  6. iDoseTR $1,386 16 payments
  7. iStent inject W $1,265 7 payments
  8. RESTASIS $750 1 payment
  9. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $682 13 payments
  10. DURYSTA $661 31 payments
  11. Other $11,850 237 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

4,851

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$600,650

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

37.9%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 298 $134,782
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 188 $92,061
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 123 $61,033
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 94 $37,116
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 84 $35,368
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 83 $28,768
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 78 $26,997
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 30 $24,219
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 417 $18,134
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 115 $17,918

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$467,664

Of which drugs: $21,261

Medicare patients

788

Average age 76

Services billed

3,873

440 women, 348 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Osteoporosis 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 25 53 $119

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $250
$250 — —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $122
$122 — —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $85
$85 298 —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $42
$42 123 —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

356 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record