Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Piette

Glaucoma Specialist East Lansing, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1861423899 CMS profile 84725

2001 Coolidge Rd, East Lansing, MI 48823

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$44,558

245 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$220,055 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Scott Piette of East Lansing, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $44,558 across 245 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $220,055 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $475 24
2024 General $5,357 26
2023 General $10,500 35
2022 General $6,052 37
2021 General $6,280 56
2020 General $4,707 18
2019 General $11,188 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Piette
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Piette were reported at $475. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Scott Piette Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $11,188 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $4,707 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $6,280 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $6,052 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $10,500 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $5,357 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $475 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $21,030 71 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $20,746 74 payments
  3. Sight Sciences, Inc. $546 14 payments
  4. Glaukos Corporation $357 7 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $294 13 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $293 11 payments
  7. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $270 11 payments
  8. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $233 8 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $223 6 payments
  10. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $115 4 payments
  11. Other $451 26 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $28,500 18 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $7,261 17 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $5,776 206 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,000 1 payment
  5. Education $21 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XEN $15,205 32 payments
  2. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM Eye Care $15,039 23 payments
  3. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM Glaucoma $10,529 22 payments
  4. DURYSTA Eye Care $503 31 payments
  5. DURYSTA Glaucoma $434 23 payments
  6. OMNI(R) SURGICAL SYSTEM (US) $414 10 payments
  7. rocklatan $292 11 payments
  8. rhopressa $273 10 payments
  9. Cequa $210 7 payments
  10. EYLEA $198 5 payments
  11. Other $2,658 139 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

4,852

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$453,860

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

38.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 286 $125,656
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 57 $58,716
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 123 $34,187
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 94 $29,099
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 48 $20,543
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 55 $19,871
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 46 $16,753
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 341 $16,262
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 121 $16,251
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 34 $15,686

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$294,921

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,065

Average age 77

Services billed

4,160

601 women, 464 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 18%
Osteoporosis 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $174
$174 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $60
$60 46 —
OXERVATE
  • Dompe US, Inc. $41
$41 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

245 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record