Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Savitha Kadakol

Hematology & Oncology Sterling Heights, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1477569176 CMS profile 248570

8244 Metropolitan Pkwy, Suite A, Sterling Heights, MI 48312

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,883

1,017 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Savitha Kadakol of Sterling Heights, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,883 across 1,017 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,204 151
2024 General $3,059 147
2023 General $3,007 150
2022 General $3,146 170
2021 General $2,975 176
2020 General $1,437 87
2019 General $2,056 136

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Savitha Kadakol
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Savitha Kadakol were reported at $3,204. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Savitha Kadakol Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,056 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $1,437 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $2,975 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $3,146 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $3,007 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $3,059 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $3,204 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,353 69 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,291 76 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,105 73 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,034 55 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $927 55 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $882 38 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $875 55 payments
  8. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $655 47 payments
  9. Eisai Inc. $632 35 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $603 24 payments
  11. Other $9,527 490 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,178 997 payments
  2. Education $705 20 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $895 46 payments
  2. OPDIVO $777 45 payments
  3. Lenvima $597 33 payments
  4. KISQALI $561 30 payments
  5. ZEPZELCA $529 30 payments
  6. SARCLISA $475 19 payments
  7. TECENTRIQ $472 40 payments
  8. FOTIVDA $467 21 payments
  9. JAKAFI $467 24 payments
  10. TAGRISSO $429 22 payments
  11. Other $17,169 951 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

933

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$2,647,511

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

39%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 34 $568,184
Idhifa Enasidenib Mesylate Brand 11 $374,709
Lenalidomide Generic 26 $292,523
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 15 $264,090
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 14 $259,512
Alecensa Alectinib Hcl Brand 12 $226,913
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 13 $213,096
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 52 $183,684
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 149 $183,627
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 64 $62,655

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,281,796

Of which drugs: $1,135,988

Medicare patients

448

Average age 74

Services billed

102,949

277 women, 171 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Cancer 33%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Depression 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 11 3,180 $66,074
Injection, epoetin alfa, biosimilar, (retacrit) (for non-esrd use), 1000 units Q5106 Office 12 2,800 $15,816
Injection, ferumoxytol, for treatment of iron deficiency anemia, 1 mg (non-esrd use) Q0138 Office 39 51,510 $14,407
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 11 16,500 $14,315
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 11 13 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 72 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
$178 — —
SARCLISA
$134 — —
ENHERTU
$118 — —
Lenvima
$103 — —
JAKAFI
$102 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 72 with Patron

Records

1,017 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record