Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sarah Glorioso

Dermatology Bossier City, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1093916140 CMS profile 593602

2300 Hospital Dr., Suite 400, Bossier City, LA 71111

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,432

364 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sarah Glorioso of Bossier City, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,432 across 364 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $932 41
2024 General $1,170 53
2023 General $1,374 63
2022 General $1,004 52
2021 General $588 21
2020 General $430 21
2019 General $1,933 113

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sarah Glorioso
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sarah Glorioso were reported at $932. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Sarah Glorioso Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,933 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $430 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $588 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,004 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,374 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,170 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $932 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,449 95 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,154 63 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $729 24 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $703 23 payments
  5. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $536 22 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $464 25 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $423 31 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $397 21 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $290 5 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $213 8 payments
  11. Other $1,075 47 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,921 356 payments
  2. Education $511 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $698 22 payments
  2. COSENTYX Dermatology $611 28 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $519 28 payments
  4. COSENTYX Immunology $496 32 payments
  5. BOTOX $478 16 payments
  6. EUCRISA $423 31 payments
  7. RINVOQ $412 34 payments
  8. TALTZ $292 19 payments
  9. HUMIRA $242 13 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $196 7 payments
  11. Other $2,310 119 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,936

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,043,128

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $255,229
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 18 $252,235
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 15 $137,362
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 15 $104,859
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 26 $98,043
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 19 $83,775
Taltz Syringe Ixekizumab Brand 11 $71,753
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 200 $9,679
Fluorouracil Generic 63 $3,812
Ketoconazole Generic 253 $3,631

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$426,519

Of which drugs: $3,457

Medicare patients

1,633

Average age 75

Services billed

13,271

914 women, 719 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 49 161 $801
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 98 311 $222
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 15 31 $69

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $237
$237 18 —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $141
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $63
$204 45 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $173
$173 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $142
$142 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $66
$66 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

364 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record