Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sarah Haydel

Dermatology Houma, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1811965932 CMS profile 82521

578 Valhi Blvd, Houma, LA 70360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$264,618

1,268 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Sarah Haydel of Houma, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $264,618 across 1,268 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25,627 206
2024 General $37,578 217
2023 General $37,584 188
2022 General $24,045 184
2021 General $44,248 128
2020 General $24,446 128
2019 General $71,089 217

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sarah Haydel
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sarah Haydel were reported at $25,627. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Sarah Haydel Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $71,089 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $24,446 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $44,248 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $24,045 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $37,584 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $37,578 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $25,627 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $232,107 461 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $11,875 81 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $5,949 67 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,616 38 payments
  5. Medimetriks Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,567 21 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,154 64 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,037 65 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $856 46 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $851 44 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $752 39 payments
  11. Other $5,853 342 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $227,804 113 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,565 1,077 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $6,173 54 payments
  4. Honoraria $4,800 4 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $4,650 5 payments
  6. Education $626 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI Immunology $126,241 222 payments
  2. RINVOQ $72,328 140 payments
  3. HUMIRA $20,492 81 payments
  4. COSENTYX Dermatology $8,193 23 payments
  5. SKYRIZI Immunology $5,848 21 payments
  6. Absorica LD $3,563 23 payments
  7. COSENTYX Immunology $3,337 37 payments
  8. TREMFYA $2,616 38 payments
  9. Winlevi $1,940 23 payments
  10. Neo-Synalar $1,456 15 payments
  11. Other $14,989 856 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

523

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$544,138

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

51.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 15 $304,037
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 11 $92,197
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 20 $72,130
Siliq Brodalumab Brand 12 $61,388
Progesterone Progesterone, Micronized Brand 99 $4,364
Isotretinoin Generic 14 $2,662
Armour Thyroid Thyroid,pork Brand 25 $1,434
Np Thyroid Thyroid,pork Brand 35 $1,211
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 26 $936
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 18 $818

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$81,391

Of which drugs: $104

Medicare patients

504

Average age 74

Services billed

2,663

304 women, 200 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 18%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 14 14 $67
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 52 $37

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$21,473 — —
SKYRIZI
$13,398 15 —
DUPIXENT
$317 20 —
TREMFYA
$306 — —
ADBRY
$158 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,268 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record