Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sara Ghobraiel

Ophthalmology Glendale, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1477815389 CMS profile 2338851

6677 W Thunderbird Rd Ste F101, Glendale, AZ 85306

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,677

99 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$341,009 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2021

Through program year 2025, Sara Ghobraiel of Glendale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,677 across 99 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $341,009 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $349 15
2024 General $1,002 17
2023 General $239 7
2022 General $675 10
2021 General $139 3
2020 General $329 11
2019 General $942 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sara Ghobraiel
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sara Ghobraiel were reported at $349. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Sara Ghobraiel Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $942 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $329 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $139 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $675 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $239 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,002 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $349 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $828 8 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $517 26 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $429 15 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $396 4 payments
  5. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $331 5 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $299 9 payments
  7. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $184 5 payments
  8. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $166 12 payments
  9. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $155 3 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $121 2 payments
  11. Other $250 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,677 99 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. iDose $572 6 payments
  2. Cequa $372 3 payments
  3. DURYSTA Glaucoma $244 4 payments
  4. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $223 17 payments
  5. VYZULTA $173 5 payments
  6. IACCESS $159 1 payment
  7. LUMIGAN Eye Care $157 7 payments
  8. INVELTYS $155 3 payments
  9. DURYSTA Eye Care $151 6 payments
  10. MIEBO $134 3 payments
  11. Other $1,931 62 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

2,977

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$332,045

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

32.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 141 $84,115
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 58 $64,109
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 51 $31,602
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 44 $23,954
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 25 $20,622
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 29 $12,419
Latanoprost Generic 978 $11,162
Cyclosporine Generic 13 $10,309
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 59 $9,740
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 28 $8,690

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$267,821

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

714

Average age 76

Services billed

2,883

411 women, 303 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 20%
Cancer 16%
Depression 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $122
$122 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $60
$60 — —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $52
$52 — —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $29
$29 141 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

99 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record