Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sandra Johnson

Dermatology Fort Smith, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1447256102 CMS profile 19756

5921 Riley Park Dr, Fort Smith, AR 72916

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$542,904

1,349 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$516,595

Paid to them · 16 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$5,445,252 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Sandra Johnson of Fort Smith, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $542,904 across 1,349 general payments and $516,595 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $5,445,252 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $120,962 186
2025 Research $192,959 1
2024 General $140,583 252
2024 Research $285,510 2
2023 General $89,213 233
2023 Research $463 2
2022 General $72,602 205
2022 Research $372 2
2021 General $43,261 181
2021 Research $2,838 2
2020 General $8,444 121
2020 Research $202 2
2019 General $67,840 171
2019 Research $34,252 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sandra Johnson
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sandra Johnson were reported at $120,962. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Sandra Johnson Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $67,840 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $8,444 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $43,261 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $72,602 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $89,213 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $140,583 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $120,962 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $148,212 223 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $85,863 78 payments
  3. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $77,132 100 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $63,604 71 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $36,012 37 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $31,478 153 payments
  7. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $28,741 144 payments
  8. Organon LLC $18,456 28 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $13,572 41 payments
  10. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $12,743 15 payments
  11. Other $27,092 459 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $403,960 147 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $57,995 16 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $41,008 158 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $23,044 1,003 payments
  5. Honoraria $16,305 7 payments
  6. Education $592 18 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla Inflammation $139,727 217 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Immunology $108,452 95 payments
  3. VTAMA $95,499 122 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $48,807 59 payments
  5. Otezla Dermatology $34,945 30 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $14,716 7 payments
  7. NEMLUVIO $11,998 24 payments
  8. Candin $11,750 1 payment
  9. TREMFYA $6,799 65 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology $5,748 4 payments
  11. Other $23,513 778 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nielsen BioSciences, Inc. $481,053 3 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $35,542 13 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,207

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$26,635

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

10.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mometasone Furoate Generic 154 $3,561
Fluorouracil Generic 40 $3,030
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 141 $2,765
Ketoconazole Generic 98 $2,353
Tacrolimus Generic 20 $2,271
Metronidazole Generic 26 $2,088
Calcipotriene Generic 14 $2,057
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 166 $1,665
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 99 $1,648
Mupirocin Generic 131 $1,058

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$561,257

Of which drugs: $298,994

Medicare patients

1,209

Average age 75

Services billed

23,477

782 women, 427 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 46 14,200 $18,804

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
$61,979 — —
DUPIXENT
$27,313 — —
VTAMA
$24,189 — —
TREMFYA
$164 — —
TALTZ
$140 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,365 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record