Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jennifer Jacks

Dermatology Pine Bluff, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1699948901 CMS profile 258103

1718 W 42Nd Ave, Pine Bluff, AR 71603

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,508

540 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jennifer Jacks of Pine Bluff, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,508 across 540 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $11,361 80
2024 General $2,157 101
2023 General $1,475 78
2022 General $1,963 102
2021 General $1,103 61
2020 General $528 28
2019 General $1,922 90

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jennifer Jacks
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jennifer Jacks were reported at $11,361. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Jennifer Jacks Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,922 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $528 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,103 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,963 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,475 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,157 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $11,361 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $10,495 27 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,284 129 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,302 65 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,142 57 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $948 59 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $935 38 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $781 39 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $593 25 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $430 23 payments
  10. LEO Pharma Inc. $384 24 payments
  11. Other $1,214 54 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,365 532 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $9,100 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $715 2 payments
  4. Education $328 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $1,346 72 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $1,275 45 payments
  3. TALTZ $1,200 64 payments
  4. TREMFYA $859 54 payments
  5. RINVOQ $760 42 payments
  6. COSENTYX Immunology $552 23 payments
  7. HUMIRA $539 31 payments
  8. COSENTYX Dermatology $512 28 payments
  9. SOTYKTU $504 20 payments
  10. Cimzia $450 19 payments
  11. Other $5,174 272 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

2,739

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$2,958,359

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 49 $1,012,983
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 110 $402,963
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 45 $394,105
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 37 $240,973
Otezla Apremilast Brand 48 $234,383
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 33 $121,355
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $111,698
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $97,579
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $96,808
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 15 $96,124

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$435,301

Of which drugs: $5,601

Medicare patients

2,495

Average age 75

Services billed

10,807

1,421 women, 1,074 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Diabetes 27%
Depression 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Heart failure 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 18 18 $5,601

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $278
$278 24 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $265
$265 49 —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $237
$237 143 —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $219
$219 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $160
$160 48 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

540 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record