Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rocky McAdams

Ophthalmology Abilene, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1740442607 CMS profile 215534

2120 Antilley Rd, Abilene, TX 79606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,583

143 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rocky McAdams of Abilene, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,583 across 143 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $623 31
2024 General $2,734 14
2023 General $526 21
2022 General $1,378 22
2021 General $538 23
2020 General $358 17
2019 General $426 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rocky McAdams
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rocky McAdams were reported at $623. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Rocky McAdams Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $426 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $358 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $538 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,378 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $526 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $2,734 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $623 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec USA, Inc. $2,454 3 payments
  2. NotalVision $814 4 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $705 32 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $670 27 payments
  5. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $266 8 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $238 14 payments
  7. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $230 8 payments
  8. Glaukos Corporation $212 5 payments
  9. Sight Sciences, Inc. $173 9 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $139 8 payments
  11. Other $682 25 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,264 136 payments
  2. Long term medical supply or device loan $2,421 2 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $814 4 payments
  4. Entertainment $83 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LUMERA 700 $2,454 3 payments
  2. VYZULTA $341 15 payments
  3. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM Eye Care $334 12 payments
  4. rhopressa $290 9 payments
  5. rocklatan $290 9 payments
  6. DURYSTA $280 10 payments
  7. Clareon $245 12 payments
  8. ORA $122 3 payments
  9. UNITY $117 9 payments
  10. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM Glaucoma $99 5 payments
  11. Other $2,797 101 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

3,872

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$223,627

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

48.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Difluprednate Generic 739 $67,975
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 1,353 $30,532
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 84 $22,808
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 22 $18,460
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 44 $17,389
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 37 $11,334
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 29 $8,868
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 267 $8,695
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 31 $6,671
Latanoprost Generic 643 $4,728

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$654,743

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,784

Average age 75

Services billed

5,520

1,020 women, 764 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
COPD 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $50
$50 — —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $24
$24 — —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $24
$24 44 —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 84 —
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

143 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record