Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robyn Moran

Rheumatology Topeka, KS Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1609257476 CMS profile 1343169

901 Sw Garfield Ave, Topeka, KS 66606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,701

138 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robyn Moran of Topeka, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,701 across 138 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 51st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $58 3
2024 General $609 27
2023 General $616 30
2022 General $873 48
2021 General $544 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robyn Moran
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robyn Moran were reported at $58. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Robyn Moran Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $544 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $873 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $616 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $609 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $58 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $528 31 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $458 19 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $257 16 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $221 11 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $176 9 payments
  6. Sobi, Inc $140 5 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $124 6 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $104 5 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $90 5 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $79 4 payments
  11. Other $524 27 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,701 138 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RINVOQ $408 23 payments
  2. XELJANZ $257 16 payments
  3. Cimzia $176 9 payments
  4. SIMPONI ARIA $150 8 payments
  5. Otezla $146 7 payments
  6. KINERET $140 5 payments
  7. Enbrel Inflammation $125 5 payments
  8. Enbrel Inflammation $122 6 payments
  9. REMICADE $105 5 payments
  10. TREMFYA $103 5 payments
  11. Other $1,586 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

549

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$112,337

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 14 $95,248
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 185 $8,507
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 82 $2,930
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 20 $2,160
Prednisone Generic 127 $996
Sulfasalazine Generic 26 $970
Methotrexate Sodium Methotrexate Sodium/Pf Brand 27 $507
Celecoxib Generic 29 $336
Leflunomide Generic 11 $275
Omeprazole Generic 11 $252

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$977,068

Of which drugs: $861,711

Medicare patients

377

Average age 73

Services billed

103,679

300 women, 77 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Osteoporosis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 34 6,550 $220,914
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 27 40,680 $189,967
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 38 4,900 $120,786
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 32 32,801 $118,290
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 43 11,956 $106,957
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 28 2,520 $51,819

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $90
$90 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $75
$75 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $56
$56 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $44
$44 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $40
$40 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

138 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record