Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Robert Laugherty

Physician Assistant Alcoa, TN Physician Assistant

NPI 1932368552 CMS profile 10989817

266 Joule St, Alcoa, TN 37701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$122,299

705 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Robert Laugherty of Alcoa, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $122,299 across 705 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $24,078 138
2024 General $20,798 134
2023 General $33,415 133
2022 General $25,769 139
2021 General $18,238 161

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Robert Laugherty
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Robert Laugherty were reported at $24,078. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Robert Laugherty Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $18,238 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $25,769 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $33,415 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $20,798 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $24,078 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $58,783 137 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $23,091 122 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $15,509 20 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $15,307 73 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,996 39 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $2,195 131 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $931 34 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $751 15 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $744 39 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $500 33 payments
  11. Other $1,493 62 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $83,058 95 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $17,150 61 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $12,505 537 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $9,128 6 payments
  5. Education $459 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TALTZ $49,978 103 payments
  2. Otezla $22,198 82 payments
  3. Bimzelx $13,532 38 payments
  4. TREMFYA $2,929 35 payments
  5. RINVOQ $1,931 114 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $931 34 payments
  7. Cimzia $544 34 payments
  8. COSENTYX $529 28 payments
  9. XELJANZ $500 33 payments
  10. KEVZARA $466 11 payments
  11. Other $4,101 213 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

4,341

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$3,350,116

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

30.8%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 55 $506,995
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 71 $462,713
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 47 $448,920
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 51 $413,815
Orencia Abatacept Brand 31 $211,761
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 30 $192,969
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 21 $177,385
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 23 $160,491
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 25 $153,127
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 25 $143,521

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$54,804

Of which drugs: $548

Medicare patients

336

Average age 73

Services billed

3,791

239 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 28%
Osteoporosis 28%
COPD 24%
Depression 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 28 2,304 $236
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 11 12 $46
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 18 60 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $8,557
  • Eli Lilly and Company $53
$8,610 23 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $3,200
$3,200 14 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $473
$473 71 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $431
$431 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $339
$339 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

705 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record