Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rick Chatwell

Rheumatology Lincoln, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1841260478 CMS profile 38596

3901 Pine Lake Rd, Suite 120, Lincoln, NE 68516

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,041

93 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rick Chatwell of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,041 across 93 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 47th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $53 2
2024 General $447 18
2023 General $458 21
2022 General $516 19
2021 General $248 12
2020 General $42 2
2019 General $276 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rick Chatwell
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rick Chatwell were reported at $53. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Rick Chatwell Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $276 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $42 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $248 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $516 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $458 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $447 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $53 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $609 28 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $219 7 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $205 9 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $176 5 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $174 10 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $154 4 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $93 5 payments
  8. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $82 4 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $73 5 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $59 4 payments
  11. Other $197 12 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,029 92 payments
  2. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Prolia $223 12 payments
  2. EVENITY $222 12 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $219 7 payments
  4. AMJEVITA $144 3 payments
  5. Otezla $114 3 payments
  6. TREMFYA $111 6 payments
  7. RINVOQ $109 5 payments
  8. COSENTYX $102 3 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $101 7 payments
  10. Enbrel $88 5 payments
  11. Other $937 49 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

660

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$124,577

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 14 $115,547
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 167 $3,449
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 66 $2,579
Prednisone Generic 253 $1,185
Sulfasalazine Generic 21 $422
Allopurinol Generic 30 $371
Alendronate Sodium Generic 39 $297
Leflunomide Generic 14 $286
Omeprazole Generic 24 $236
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 14 $147

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 101 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,725,828

Of which drugs: $4,266,944

Medicare patients

1,244

Average age 75

Services billed

526,963

898 women, 346 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Osteoporosis 50%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Depression 19%
Diabetes 17%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 61 27,300 $924,441
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 96 228,400 $819,316
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 48 138,880 $634,557
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 318 26,640 $544,708
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 34 5,534 $330,394
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 74 12,720 $317,824
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 48 27,350 $249,386
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 34 28,770 $246,323
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 38 1,725 $393
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 41 2,796 $283

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $51
$51 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $49
$49 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $36
$36 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $32
$32 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $27
$27 — 28,770

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

93 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record