Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Russell

Internal Medicine Madison, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1063584175 CMS profile 230119

106 Highland Way Ste 200, Madison, MS 39110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,572

631 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Richard Russell of Madison, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,572 across 631 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,426 71
2024 General $1,119 62
2023 General $1,552 85
2022 General $2,036 127
2021 General $1,616 81
2020 General $402 27
2019 General $2,422 178

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Russell
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Russell were reported at $1,426. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Richard Russell Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,422 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $402 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,616 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,036 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,552 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,119 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,426 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,240 63 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,075 68 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $935 52 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $911 53 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $745 56 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $601 38 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $588 44 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $570 37 payments
  9. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $469 17 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $403 31 payments
  11. Other $3,036 172 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,550 628 payments
  2. Education $22 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,124 55 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $825 43 payments
  3. FARXIGA $517 34 payments
  4. Repatha $476 25 payments
  5. NEXLETOL $469 17 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $441 34 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $439 32 payments
  8. BELSOMRA $395 23 payments
  9. EVENITY $379 23 payments
  10. Prolia $375 23 payments
  11. Other $11,053 704 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 132 drugs

Part D claims

10,288

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,130,396

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 228 $250,376
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 136 $175,074
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 83 $105,437
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 87 $91,235
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 71 $67,720
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 38 $47,698
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 30 $46,242
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 44 $44,949
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 36 $35,419
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 38 $27,500

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 132 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$264,687

Of which drugs: $67,508

Medicare patients

666

Average age 76

Services billed

8,206

324 women, 342 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 23%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Cancer 18%
Depression 17%
Atrial fibrillation 12%
Osteoporosis 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 2,160 $43,805
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 157 157 $12,757
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 37 37 $10,724
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 14 82 $58
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 19 76 $34
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 53 464 $31

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $81
  • Lundbeck LLC $60
$141 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $78
$78 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $64
$64 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $63
$63 71 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $60
$60 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

631 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record