Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Miller

Dermatology Port Richey, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1023007242 CMS profile 182803

8220 US Highway 19, Port Richey, FL 34668

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$39,155

350 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Richard Miller of Port Richey, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $39,155 across 350 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,894 53
2024 General $2,480 56
2023 General $3,417 57
2022 General $2,145 45
2021 General $4,128 31
2020 General $5,545 23
2019 General $19,546 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Miller
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Miller were reported at $1,894. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Richard Miller Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $19,546 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $5,545 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $4,128 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,145 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,417 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,480 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,894 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $24,941 62 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,809 18 payments
  3. Encore Dermatology Inc. $1,729 8 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,135 27 payments
  5. Epsfl, LLC $1,043 4 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $848 17 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $780 28 payments
  8. Kerecis Limited $628 12 payments
  9. Biofrontera Inc. $609 15 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $534 16 payments
  11. Other $5,099 143 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $22,419 13 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $13,231 322 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,620 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $673 7 payments
  5. Education $212 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $12,412 27 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $9,622 14 payments
  3. Impoyz $1,729 8 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,517 9 payments
  5. DUPIXENT $730 19 payments
  6. Kerecis Omega3 SurgiClose $586 4 payments
  7. RINVOQ $584 14 payments
  8. XEPI $569 13 payments
  9. BF-RhodoLED $547 12 payments
  10. Kerecis Omega3 Marigen $425 3 payments
  11. Other $9,878 306 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

622

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$143,720

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 13 $82,672
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 12 $44,852
Fluorouracil Generic 39 $2,481
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 114 $2,410
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 41 $1,647
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 26 $1,586
Imiquimod Generic 35 $1,342
Fluocinonide Generic 19 $1,211
Nystatin Generic 20 $1,077
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 17 $968

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 129 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$886,367

Of which drugs: $77,905

Medicare patients

1,085

Average age 76

Services billed

7,720

530 women, 555 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 21%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 14 16 $4,954
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 31 55 $39

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Zoryve
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $318
$318 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $186
$186 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $175
$175 13 —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $169
$169 — —
XOLAIR
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $144
$144 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

350 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record