Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Leggett

Family Medicine Victoria, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1336162064 CMS profile 15347

2700 Citizens Plz, Suite 100, Victoria, TX 77901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,015

414 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,984,783 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Richard Leggett of Victoria, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,015 across 414 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,984,783 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $553 31
2024 General $849 58
2023 General $1,288 62
2022 General $1,185 64
2021 General $1,320 74
2020 General $1,139 52
2019 General $8,680 73

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Leggett
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Leggett were reported at $553. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Richard Leggett Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $8,680 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,139 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,320 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,185 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,288 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $849 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $553 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk AS $7,642 4 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,161 75 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $777 43 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $566 35 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $523 26 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $461 27 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $372 31 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $358 8 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $338 20 payments
  10. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $297 15 payments
  11. Other $2,521 130 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $7,716 4 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,004 405 payments
  3. Education $295 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $8,047 29 payments
  2. UBRELVY $786 49 payments
  3. FARXIGA $417 26 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $356 16 payments
  5. QULIPTA $337 21 payments
  6. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $303 18 payments
  7. GARDASIL 9 $293 4 payments
  8. ZENPEP $222 12 payments
  9. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $210 14 payments
  10. Wegovy $208 12 payments
  11. Other $5,659 357 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 134 drugs

Part D claims

7,851

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$590,784

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

16.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 139 $136,953
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 60 $77,661
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 72 $68,554
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 23 $41,362
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 26 $33,855
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 21 $23,361
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 32 $22,725
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 19 $18,411
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 16 $14,499
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 28 $14,191

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 134 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$96,288

Of which drugs: $297

Medicare patients

441

Average age 77

Services billed

1,780

215 women, 226 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Heart failure 35%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
Depression 31%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Auvelity
  • Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $162
$162 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $92
$92 — —
TRINTELLIX
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $80
$80 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $62
$62 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $62
$62 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

414 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record