Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Mendez

Family Medicine Lubbock, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1649433863 CMS profile 255832

7008 Indiana Ave, Ste. A, Lubbock, TX 79413

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$367,953

289 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$875

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Mendez of Lubbock, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $367,953 across 289 general payments and $875 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $96,381 69
2024 General $79,171 51
2023 General $90,381 51
2022 General $100,834 47
2021 General $513 23
2020 General $249 18
2020 Research $875 1
2019 General $426 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Mendez
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Mendez were reported at $96,381. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Michael Mendez Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $426 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $249 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $513 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $100,834 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $90,381 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $79,171 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $96,381 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kedplasma LLC $349,778 107 payments
  2. CSL Plasma Inc. $15,050 22 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $339 13 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $339 13 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $243 15 payments
  6. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $238 20 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $223 15 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $210 11 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $156 8 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $138 2 payments
  11. Other $1,239 63 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $364,828 129 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $3,124 160 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRINTELLIX $356 15 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $243 15 payments
  3. TROKENDI XR $219 18 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $203 9 payments
  5. PREVNAR 20 $198 10 payments
  6. ABRYSVO $198 10 payments
  7. COMIRNATY $157 8 payments
  8. AURYON LASER SYSTEM 100-120 VAC $137 1 payment
  9. REZUM $117 1 payment
  10. BOTOX $89 2 payments
  11. Other $1,673 96 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $875 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 243 drugs

Part D claims

22,044

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,656,938

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 217 $245,310
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 346 $146,209
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 162 $138,629
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 111 $109,282
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 115 $104,439
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 75 $79,895
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 120 $66,972
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 29 $54,248
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 58 $44,640
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 159 $39,436

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 243 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 86 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$295,161

Of which drugs: $3,545

Medicare patients

482

Average age 74

Services billed

6,171

271 women, 211 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Alzheimer's or dementia 73%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 41%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
COPD 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 21 21 $758
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 180 $143
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 11 46 $15
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 15 75 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $89
$89 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $49
$49 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $45
$45 — —
ABRYSVO
  • PFIZER INC. $41
$41 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $37
$37 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

290 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record