Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Richard Gordon

Voorhees, NJ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1407859259 CMS profile 200274

705 White Horse Rd, Ste D105, Voorhees, NJ 08043

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$41,036

1,753 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Richard Gordon of Voorhees, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $41,036 across 1,753 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,800 178
2024 General $5,732 236
2023 General $6,671 247
2022 General $7,330 288
2021 General $7,161 293
2020 General $4,713 238
2019 General $5,629 273

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Richard Gordon
  • New Jersey median
  • Middle half of New Jersey
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Richard Gordon were reported at $3,800. Among 31,834 New Jersey profiles paid that year, the median was $178 and the middle half received between $51 and $585.

Show as a table
Year Richard Gordon New Jersey median Middle half National median
2019 $5,629 $150 $44–$542 $163
2020 $4,713 $110 $33–$349 $114
2021 $7,161 $125 $36–$419 $132
2022 $7,330 $142 $42–$480 $149
2023 $6,671 $156 $48–$510 $160
2024 $5,732 $167 $50–$562 $164
2025 $3,800 $178 $51–$585 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,246 134 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,665 123 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,313 76 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,948 90 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $1,787 44 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $1,787 46 payments
  7. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $1,574 45 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,559 105 payments
  9. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $1,419 54 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1,350 70 payments
  11. Other $20,389 966 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $35,015 1,675 payments
  2. Education $3,685 46 payments
  3. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,198 13 payments
  4. Gift $1,028 18 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $110 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISQALI $2,781 64 payments
  2. OPDIVO $1,783 81 payments
  3. IMBRUVICA Oncology $1,215 31 payments
  4. XPOVIO $1,214 23 payments
  5. DARZALEX $1,019 18 payments
  6. KEYTRUDA $879 54 payments
  7. Lenvima $811 56 payments
  8. MONJUVI $708 18 payments
  9. CALQUENCE $697 29 payments
  10. IMBRUVICA Oncology $675 31 payments
  11. Other $32,538 1,672 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 63 drugs

Part D claims

1,985

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$8,905,264

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

59.3%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 78 $1,129,647
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 67 $1,008,029
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 60 $947,578
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 41 $677,900
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Brand 49 $637,108
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 26 $423,373
Procrit Epoetin Alfa Brand 90 $335,404
Trodelvy Sacituzumab Govitecan-Hziy Brand 11 $295,656
Darzalex Daratumumab Brand 37 $269,529
Tavalisse Fostamatinib Disodium Brand 17 $252,761

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 63 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 102 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,334,687

Of which drugs: $1,099,363

Medicare patients

537

Average age 75

Services billed

183,695

318 women, 219 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 42%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Cancer 31%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
COPD 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 96 134,450 $117,200
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 14 1,500 $31,479
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 13 2,221 $14,110
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 35 2,546 $227
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 36 135 $83
Injection, granisetron hydrochloride, 100 mcg J1626 Office 13 350 $81

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 89 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
$388 — —
TECVAYLI
$297 — —
DARZALEX
$261 86 —
IMBRUVICA
$250 67 —
VENCLEXTA
$240 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 89 with Patron

Records

1,753 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record