Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rex Heaton

Nurse Practitioner, Family Saint George, UT Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1477627917 CMS profile 10485958

2019 E Riverside Dr Ste A200, Saint George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,891

806 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rex Heaton of Saint George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,891 across 806 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,931 145
2024 General $2,582 117
2023 General $3,563 183
2022 General $3,633 182
2021 General $3,181 179

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rex Heaton
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rex Heaton were reported at $2,931. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Rex Heaton Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $3,181 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $3,633 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $3,563 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $2,582 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,931 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,601 74 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,037 48 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $870 45 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $824 61 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $728 22 payments
  6. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $674 40 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $599 22 payments
  8. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $594 32 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $518 23 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $517 29 payments
  11. Other $7,928 410 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,980 794 payments
  2. Education $910 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $1,006 47 payments
  2. ADCETRIS $569 43 payments
  3. IMBRUVICA $505 22 payments
  4. OPDIVO $501 27 payments
  5. Lenvima $489 28 payments
  6. LIBTAYO $480 19 payments
  7. IMFINZI $446 20 payments
  8. VERZENIO $446 25 payments
  9. CALQUENCE $425 23 payments
  10. DARZALEX $404 21 payments
  11. Other $14,290 769 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,075

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$106,663

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

16%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 37 $47,108
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 37 $35,289
Anastrozole Generic 147 $2,859
Hydroxyurea Generic 103 $2,715
Anagrelide Hcl Generic 22 $2,423
Letrozole Generic 47 $1,898
Exemestane Generic 11 $1,510
Potassium Chloride Generic 50 $1,318
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 41 $1,280
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 34 $1,074

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 111 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$623,549

Of which drugs: $586,363

Medicare patients

253

Average age 76

Services billed

42,218

131 women, 122 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 49%
Cancer 46%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Osteoporosis 28%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 32 2,820 $56,198
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 12 220 $166
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 12 44 $46
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 16 490 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 58 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $181
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $53
$234 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $172
$172 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $152
$152 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $105
$105 — —
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $81
$81 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 58 with Patron

Records

806 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record