Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Raymundo Romero

Medical Oncology Glendale, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1568537314 CMS profile 25975

1505 Wilson Ter, Suite 340, Glendale, CA 91206

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$36,133

1,481 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$17,000 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2020

Through program year 2025, Raymundo Romero of Glendale, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $36,133 across 1,481 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $17,000 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,171 256
2024 General $6,124 245
2023 General $5,058 220
2022 General $4,691 193
2021 General $5,408 217
2020 General $4,671 147
2019 General $4,008 203

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Raymundo Romero
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Raymundo Romero were reported at $6,171. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Raymundo Romero Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,008 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $4,671 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $5,408 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $4,691 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $5,058 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $6,124 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $6,171 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,865 166 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,253 85 payments
  3. Eisai Inc. $2,197 28 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,012 72 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,963 109 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,601 68 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,572 100 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $1,409 65 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $992 40 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $922 50 payments
  11. Other $16,346 698 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $30,831 1,425 payments
  2. Long term medical supply or device loan $2,181 25 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,593 1 payment
  4. Education $1,528 30 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISQALI $2,860 64 payments
  2. Lenvima $2,175 27 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $1,576 67 payments
  4. ERLEADA $1,153 38 payments
  5. REBLOZYL $1,051 50 payments
  6. OPDIVO $1,014 62 payments
  7. LYNPARZA $782 21 payments
  8. VERZENIO $731 36 payments
  9. GILOTRIF $689 41 payments
  10. Stivarga $676 35 payments
  11. Other $29,298 1,349 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

1,205

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$2,877,234

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

34.2%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Brand 26 $487,277
Lenalidomide Generic 25 $358,707
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 22 $358,179
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 24 $327,132
Xgeva Denosumab Brand 63 $189,710
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $188,291
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 12 $187,783
Keytruda Pembrolizumab Brand 18 $186,872
Lupron Depot Leuprolide Acetate Brand 69 $148,824
Kadcyla Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine Brand 14 $102,443

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,405

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

257

Average age 74

Services billed

2,734

143 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 67%
Chronic kidney disease 57%
Arthritis 55%
Heart failure 53%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Cancer 40%
Atrial fibrillation 36%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 88 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KISQALI
$794 — —
REBLOZYL
$367 — —
KEYTRUDA
$290 18 —
OPDIVO
$185 — —
ENHERTU
$179 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 88 with Patron

Records

1,481 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record