Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noam Drazin

Medical Oncology Beverly Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1952313520 CMS profile 87832

200 N Robertson Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,423,667

1,983 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Noam Drazin of Beverly Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,423,667 across 1,983 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $148,981 152
2024 General $190,724 175
2023 General $200,940 248
2022 General $209,640 296
2021 General $262,472 388
2020 General $151,266 254
2019 General $259,645 470

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noam Drazin
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noam Drazin were reported at $148,981. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Noam Drazin Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $259,645 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $151,266 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $262,472 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $209,640 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $200,940 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $190,724 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $148,981 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $845,378 773 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $268,669 352 payments
  3. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $146,008 169 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $76,387 107 payments
  5. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $40,252 49 payments
  6. Eli Lilly and Company $14,090 11 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $13,782 62 payments
  8. BeiGene USA, Inc. $4,069 5 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $2,890 22 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,306 40 payments
  11. Other $9,837 393 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,164,744 527 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $179,423 544 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $43,790 19 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $35,297 880 payments
  5. Education $414 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TAGRISSO $369,989 324 payments
  2. CALQUENCE $204,179 190 payments
  3. IMFINZI $163,075 143 payments
  4. VERZENIO $146,326 185 payments
  5. ENHERTU $92,783 105 payments
  6. XGEVA $41,820 47 payments
  7. Datroway $35,951 35 payments
  8. Vectibix $34,485 58 payments
  9. CYRAMZA $29,888 27 payments
  10. TUKYSA $27,219 29 payments
  11. Other $155,251 789 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

982

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$2,341,383

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

54.9%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 31 $486,972
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 26 $366,911
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 14 $248,709
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 17 $247,614
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 278 $235,338
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 14 $230,512
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 15 $222,865
Orgovyx Relugolix Brand 35 $95,418
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 21 $94,566
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 23 $53,001

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$196,482

Of which drugs: $57,444

Medicare patients

391

Average age 75

Services billed

12,918

209 women, 182 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Cancer 36%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 25 7,520 $47,210

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
$68,612 — —
TAGRISSO
$41,962 14 —
IMFINZI
$32,023 — —
CALQUENCE
$30,388 31 —
VERZENIO
$5,889 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,983 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record