Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rattandeep Singh

Rheumatology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1174536478 CMS profile 325853

371 E Paces Ferry Road, Suite 525, Atlanta, GA 30305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,790

1,035 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rattandeep Singh of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,790 across 1,035 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,519 221
2024 General $4,300 202
2023 General $3,652 189
2022 General $2,915 157
2021 General $1,633 90
2020 General $1,295 70
2019 General $1,475 106

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rattandeep Singh
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rattandeep Singh were reported at $4,519. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Rattandeep Singh Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,475 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,295 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,633 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,915 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,652 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $4,300 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $4,519 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,939 203 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,854 182 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,725 75 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,170 86 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,083 62 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $961 65 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $860 43 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $741 38 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $674 37 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $616 31 payments
  11. Other $4,167 213 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,561 1,030 payments
  2. Education $229 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,465 115 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,281 57 payments
  3. Otezla $1,119 55 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $852 39 payments
  5. XELJANZ $806 40 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $798 36 payments
  7. Cimzia $774 45 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $741 38 payments
  9. KRYSTEXXA $725 38 payments
  10. COSENTYX $673 50 payments
  11. Other $13,486 730 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 47 drugs

Part D claims

2,243

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,370,870

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 38 $307,287
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 36 $264,885
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $148,657
Taltz Syringe Ixekizumab Brand 11 $147,988
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 18 $113,599
Otezla Apremilast Brand 15 $99,272
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 12 $86,662
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 18 $80,195
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 11 $71,940
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 269 $10,800

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 47 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,103,191

Of which drugs: $2,815,433

Medicare patients

435

Average age 72

Services billed

129,101

320 women, 115 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Osteoporosis 27%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 20%
Diabetes 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 12 47,480 $223,194
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 30 8,930 $221,476
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 14 6,600 $219,208
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 14 10,600 $96,763
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 28 2,580 $53,164
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 17 1,573 $358
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 46 2,801 $290
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 24 35 $150
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 38 225 $145
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 18 106 $83

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$597 18 —
TREMFYA
$452 11 —
Enbrel
$326 50 —
KRYSTEXXA
$199 — —
SKYRIZI
$192 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

1,035 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record