Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rashad Ansari

Rheumatology Vista, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1063594372 CMS profile 48615

2023W Vista Way J, Ste. J, Vista, CA 92083

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,239

808 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Rashad Ansari of Vista, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,239 across 808 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,244 125
2024 General $2,999 134
2023 General $3,003 141
2022 General $2,452 104
2021 General $2,427 105
2020 General $1,935 87
2019 General $2,179 112

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rashad Ansari
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rashad Ansari were reported at $2,244. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Rashad Ansari Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,179 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,935 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,427 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,452 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,003 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,999 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,244 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,318 159 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,620 109 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,386 142 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,309 54 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,189 48 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,106 47 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $860 42 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $781 42 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $714 34 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $491 18 payments
  11. Other $2,464 113 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,239 808 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,793 108 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,630 71 payments
  3. Otezla $1,114 65 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $1,106 47 payments
  5. Enbrel $909 49 payments
  6. TALTZ $819 40 payments
  7. COSENTYX $814 34 payments
  8. Cimzia $808 38 payments
  9. XELJANZ $778 41 payments
  10. OLUMIANT $762 37 payments
  11. Other $11,354 511 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

3,497

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$4,577,548

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

39.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 150 $994,382
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 115 $694,715
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 77 $547,475
Orencia Abatacept/Maltose Brand 106 $456,942
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 76 $413,003
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 47 $295,888
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 30 $205,894
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 25 $183,146
Prolia Denosumab Brand 105 $170,758
Otezla Apremilast Brand 37 $170,534

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$66,164

Of which drugs: $52,139

Medicare patients

153

Average age 75

Services billed

3,671

112 women, 41 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Osteoporosis 51%
Depression 25%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 46 1,127 $21,213
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 15 95 $2

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$429 — —
RINVOQ
$374 47 —
Enbrel
$258 102 —
Bimzelx
$210 — —
SAPHNELO
$188 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

808 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record